My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/11/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 05/11/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:26:14 PM
Creation date
5/10/2004 7:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/11/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
review shall be for the City Council to determine the City's necessity to receive the revenues <br />generated by the franchise fee. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund reviewed that for the period ending March 31, 2004, the City received <br />$129,839 in franchise fees from Connexus Energy and Centerpoint Energy - $69,905 and <br />$63,934, respectively. Based on total customers information submitted by Centerpoint and <br />Connexus in 2003, the City planned to generate $404,000 in franchise fee revenue, which is the <br />amount included in the 2004 adopted General Fund budget. Year 2004 totals would show the <br />City collecting approximately $519,356 based on the first quarter collection of $129,839, This <br />would give ma increase of $115,356 over 2004 budgeted numbers. She advised per the franchise <br />fee ordinance, the City Council must quarterly adopt a Resolution stating that the revenues are <br />necessary and that they plan to continue the franchise fee. <br /> <br />Councihnember Strommen stated given these numbers and the numbers of Case 1, which they <br />have not yet considered, she has a hard time continuing the fee when it looks like the revenues <br />are coming in where projected, and the franchise fees above where projected. When this <br />ordinance was passed there was a sense that it should be discontinued if they got into this type of <br />situation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman suggested there be serious consideration of discontinuing the fee <br />after the review of the second quarter. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig concurred. He noted the reason the franchise fee was started was so that the <br />City would not get behind in the budget. It looks like the fees are doing fairly well, however, <br />interest rates are supposed to start to spike again in August, and there are still some m~nowns <br />nOW. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen commented a review at six months would give the City the safety net <br />they were looking for in passing this ordinance in the first place, without overdoing it. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, seconded by Councilmember Strommen, to recommend <br />the City Council continue collecting franchise fee revenue with the determination that the <br />continuation or repeal of the franchise fee will be determined at each succeeding quarter, and <br />with the idea that the consideration of the repeal will be seriously considered at the end of the <br />second quarter. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Elvig, and Councilmembers Zimmerman and <br />Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #1: Authorize Transfer of General Fund Revenues <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund reviewed that the City Council adopted a policy on February 22, 1994, <br />known as the Excess Revenue Policy, which establishes a financial policy for the pm-pose of <br />allocation of excess or deficient general fund reserves. After meeting the fund balance <br />requirements at the year end, $650,965.94 remained as excess revenues to be transferred from the <br /> <br />Finance Committee/April 27, 2004 <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.