My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 05/13/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 05/13/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:49:51 AM
Creation date
5/10/2004 11:33:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
05/13/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: Ramsey Town Center, Parks, Trails and Open Space Discussion <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton explained the Ramsey Town Center LLC had submitted a parks, trails <br />and open space proposal. He noted Staff had analyzed the proposal and prepared the report for <br />the Commission's review. Civil Engineer II Linton explained the proposal provided land and <br />cash to create basic park spaces. There were spaces reserved in the parks for the signature <br />elements identified as priorities by the Parks Commission at their planning meetings with the <br />developer and landscape architect. The signature elements were identified in the proposal. <br />However, the funding vehicle was not specified. Civil Engineer II Linton stated the Commission <br />should make a motion to approve/modify/reject proposal per discussion and motion should <br />include recommendation to Council. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson indicated three primary parks were involved in the initial proposal: <br />North Park, Town Center Park and South Park. In addition, there were two other parks included <br />as part of that proposal: Downtown Commons Park and Civic Square Park. The proposal was to <br />dedicate the land for those parks and also contribute $4.2 million of infrastructure improvements <br />related to park and land dedication requirements. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson provided a copy of a memo from staff to the Commission that <br />discussed amenities within each of the parks and the preferences identified the previous year, <br />with the swimming hole being the highest priority. Concerns were traffic, staffing and expense. <br />One of the things staff had done was to ask that North Park begin as a skeletal park, considering <br />it would be three or four years before development occurred and the development would move <br />from east to west in the residential portions of the project. In addition, the proposal was above <br />and beyond the requirements of any other subdivision and was a monumental project for the City. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson stated staff had asked that a trail be placed around the outside of <br />North Park and improvement dollars be placed toward an amphitheater. Walking paths and <br />picnic shelters were also included. Two pavilions with bathrooms, open space and garden space <br />were included in the proposal and mobile turf with irrigation would be used due to soil issues <br />within the City, which was not noted in the proposal. The objective was to make sure all of the <br />areas were irrigated. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson noted he gave the Commission an amendment to the parks <br />proposal, stating the Commission had seen improvements that were concept plans identified for <br />Civic Square Park and Downtown Commons Park..The initial cost estimates were in the range <br />of $6.4 million for Civic Square Park and $900,000 for Downtown Commons Park. There was <br />concern about financing those parks considering the development had contributed more than was <br />required of a subdivision. Staff went to the bargaining table and Town Center LLC had provided <br />a generous offer, suggesting that with each new house obtaining a building permit an additional <br />$1,500 would be given toward the cost of the park. This offer provided over $3.6 million from <br />the residential portion only and did not include the retail building permits. It was not artticipated <br />that everything would be paid; however, the amount needed from the City was dramatically <br />decreased. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/April 8, 2004 <br /> Page 2 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.