Laserfiche WebLink
Park and Recreation Commission <br />Meeting Date: 07/09/2015 <br />By: Mark Riverblood, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Information <br />5. 2. <br />Title: <br />Consider Formalizing the Process for Receiving Requests for Park and Trail Related Capital Improvements <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Each year the Park and Recreation Commission develops and recommends a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan <br />to City Council. Many projects are identified in the plan for several years, and 'move up' to the present year as <br />funding and development opportunities align. New projects are added to the CIP based upon community need, <br />funding availability, and viability. <br />Throughout the year, the community—individuals and organizations request many new improvements; from splash <br />pads, to new trails, from playgrounds to community centers, to shelters, athletic fields, dog parks and so on. There <br />are so many requests (and growing) that staff recommends that both the timeline and process be formalized as <br />policy, so that all potential projects may be evaluated at the same time and in relationship to each other, and in an <br />equitable manner each year. <br />Considering projects requires careful scrutiny of the available funding for capital improvements. Additionally, all <br />capital improvements require on-going maintenance costs (day-to-day labor, utilities or annualized expenses); and <br />therefore, staff and City Council must evaluate very carefully the real and total costs of each capital improvement <br />for consideration within the context of the General Fund operations budget—at the time projects are brought <br />forward for consideration within the CIP, and then again at the time of actual project development. <br />Notification: <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Attached is the present CIP worksheet that the city uses to organize and format capital improvement projects. As <br />indicated, the purpose of this case is to recommend to City Council a policy for receiving and considering new <br />capital improvements for the city's Five -Year Parks CIP. In addition to the worksheet, staff proposes that new <br />improvement requests be accompanied by the operation and maintenance costs (outlined above), and based upon <br />the timeline below. <br />On or before October 1st each year: <br />Organizations and individuals submit all capital requests in writing, to the City, for the upcoming budget year and <br />identify any non -city financial contributions (capital costs, in-kind service and operational expenses). <br />November/December: <br />Capital requests shall be reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission and a recommendation made to the City <br />Council. <br />December/January: <br />City Council review and approval of capital requests via the city-wide 5 -year CIP. <br />Staff would summarize and conclude that all of the above processes and timeline are substantially how the CIP has <br />been formulated to date. Adoption of the proposed policy will provide a orderly 'structure' for the public to request <br />