My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/08/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 12/08/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:13:07 PM
Creation date
12/15/2015 3:20:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/08/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
failing retaining wall may still be quite stable. Structures that are typically taken out for the <br />winter months like movable docks and stairways were not recorded. These observations were <br />recorded on a paper map. <br />Finally, a third person took geo-tagged photos of the entire shoreline for reference. These photos <br />can be viewed just like normal photos, but they also contain XY coordinates and the angle at <br />which they were taken. (They can be mapped using ArcGIS 10.1, or by using the ArcPhoto add- <br />on for older versions). In order to take high quality photos, the boat typically stayed between 50 <br />and 100 feet from shore, but sometimes had to go farther out to avoid shallow water. <br />The paper atlases were then digitized into three GIS shapefiles; one for erosion condition and <br />recession rate (Recession_Rate.shp), one for shoreline structures like retaining walls and riprap <br />(Shoreline_Structures.shp), and one for discrete structures like staircases, permanent docks, and <br />buildings (Point_Structures.shp). <br />All of this information was used to create an inventory atlas of the pool which can be found in <br />the appendix to this document. The atlas contains erosion severity, shoreline structures, discrete <br />structures, and photos of the entire shoreline. To find information about structure condition see <br />the shapefiles provided with this document. <br />Symbol <br />Wisconsin NRCS Direct Volume Method <br />Recession Rate Classifications <br />Lateral <br />Recession <br />Category Rate (ft/yr) Description <br />Slight 0.01 - 0.05 Some bare bank but active erosion not <br />readily apparent. Some rills but no vegetative <br />overhang. No exposed tree roots. <br />Moderate 0.06 - 0.2 Bank is predominantly bare with some rills <br />and vegetative overhang. Some exposed <br />tree roots but no slumps or slips. <br />Severe <br />3 <br />0.3 - 0.5 Bank is bare with rills and severe vegetative overhang. Many <br />exposed tree roots and some fallen trees and slumps or slips. <br />Some changes in cultural features such as fence corners missing <br />and realignment of roads or trails. Channel cross section becomes <br />U-shaped as opposed to V-shaped <br />Very Severe 0.5+ <br />Bank is bare with gullies and severe vegetative overhang. Many <br />fallen trees, drains, and culverts eroding out and changes in cultural <br />features as above. Massive slips and washouts common. Channel <br />cross section is U-shaped and stream course may be meandering. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.