My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:23:11 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 10:28:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/04/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission 5. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 06/04/2015 <br />By: Geoff Solomonson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />PUBLIC HEARING: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Exceed Sign Size Restrictions on the Property <br />Generally Located North of 161st Avenue NW and west of Variolite Street NW; Case of the Church of St. <br />Katharine Drexel. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City has received an application from the Church of St. Katharine Drexel requesting a conditional use permit <br />(CUP) to exceed sign size restrictions for their parcel located north of 161st Avenue NW and west of Variolite <br />Street NW (the "Subject Property"). <br />The Subject Property is the site of the planned future campus for Saint Katharine Drexel, not their current location <br />of operation. Since this is not a traditional real estate sign in the sense that it is marketed for sale, nor an <br />institutional sign identifying such a use currently occurring on the Subject Property, Staff finds that processing a <br />Conditional Use Permit ensures equitable enforcement of sign regulations for parcels located in the R-1 Residential <br />District and removes any uncertainty on how this sign should be classified. Costs to process this application are <br />very minimal, so a majority of the submitted escrow is anticipated to be refunded. <br />Notification: <br />In accordance with State statute, Staff attempted to notify property owners within 350 feet of the subject property of <br />the public hearing via Standard US Mail. The Public Hearing was also noticed in the Anoka County Union Herald, <br />the City's official newsletter for public notices. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The request most closely resembles a temporary sign, specifically real estate or construction signs. Section 117-466 <br />(Other Temporary Signs) states that one (1) real estate sign per street frontage is permitted in a residential district <br />and shall not be larger than thirty-two (32) square feet. The parcel has frontage along both 161st Avenue NW and <br />Variolite Street NW. As with all sign regulations in the City, the City has built in flexibility in its sign regulations <br />through the use of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process. If the sign were to be considered a permanent sign <br />based on existing definitions in city code, the proposed sign would still exceed the allowable amount without the <br />issuance of a conditional use permit. <br />The proposed sign is one (1) unlit temporary real estate sign. The sign would be located at the southwest corner of <br />the property near the intersection of 161st Avenue NW and Variolite Street NW. The sign would replace an existing <br />'Future Home of sign and would be located just east of the existing sign location. The proposed sign is six (6) feet <br />by nine (9) feet for a total of fifty-four (54) square feet. The sign would be removed once the anticipated use <br />(religious institution) is constructed. The City does not have record of approving this previous sign. <br />The City has previously approved conditional use permit applications relating to requests to exceed square footage <br />of signs. Staff feels this is a reasonable request given the forecasted future land use and that the issuance of a <br />conditional use permit would remove any uncertainty that the sign is permitted under current city code based on <br />existing definitions. <br />Alternatives <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.