Laserfiche WebLink
20TH STREET <br />QQ ; Twenty percent of <br />the 196 loft units at <br />Potrero Launch in, San <br />Francisco are affordable <br />to households making <br />between 3o and 5o <br />percent of the area <br />median income. The <br />higher affordability <br />levels were in part the <br />result of the rezoning <br />change from industrial <br />to mixed use, which, <br />under the city's Eastern <br />Neighborhoods Plan, calls <br />for higher inclusionary <br />requirements. <br />The EN plan's main task was to identify <br />the areas that could be changed from "gray" <br />industrial areas to mixed use or residential, <br />and those areas where industrial uses, mainly <br />production, distribution, and repair uses (PDR) <br />would remain. <br />The plan provided additional benefits to <br />land owners and developers, including height <br />increases and removal of conditional use per- <br />mits for residential uses in all areas—except <br />for PDR preservation districts—and changes in <br />land -use designations from industrial in some <br />areas to residential uses. In order to learn more <br />about how much these changes enhanced land <br />values, the city hired a consultant to prepare <br />a residual land value analysis to estimate the <br />enhanced value from height increases and <br />land -use changes. The analysis showed that <br />residual land values and profitability were <br />generally higher under proposed zonings and <br />requirements than under current zoning. The <br />question remained as to how, and how much <br />of, this value could be recaptured for public <br />benefits. <br />The city had two choices: (1) to recap- <br />ture land values through individual project <br />"deals," ,utilizing development agreements <br />or similar instruments or (2) to establish a <br />priori the level of public benefit to be ex- <br />pected, proportional to the benefit received, <br />exercised through a system of fees on top of <br />baseline impact fees. To reflect the relation- <br />ship between higher densities and increased <br />value for land and development, the city es- <br />tablished a tiered approach to baseline and <br />public benefit fees (Table 1). <br />TABLE 1. FEE SCHEDULE FOR EASTERN NEIGHBORHOODS PLAN AREAS <br />To fulfill the goal of increased affordable <br />housing production in the ENs, the plan also <br />requires more affordable housing than is re- <br />quired under the city's inclusionary program. <br />Santa Monica—A Flexible, Tiered Approach <br />Santa Monica has a long-standing tradition <br />of achieving community benefits through de- <br />velopment agreements, including parks and <br />park improvements, and child care centers <br />with subsidies for low-income families. In <br />2010, after many years of extensive community <br />engagement, the city adopted the Land Use <br />and Circulation Element (LUCE). A fundamental <br />tenet of the LUCE program was that future de- <br />velopment should fund a range of measurable <br />public benefits, from open spaces and parks to <br />affordable housing. <br />As part of the LUCE preparation, prelimi- <br />nary economic studies analyzed the extent of <br />"enhanced land value" resulting from higher <br />densities. <br />These analyses indicated that projects that <br />would provide community benefits under LUCE <br />were able to achieve financial feasibility. For <br />individual projects the enhanced value is arrived <br />at through economic analyses and pro formas <br />that identify developers' profit. Consultants em- <br />ployed by the developer prepare this analysis, <br />which is then reviewed by consultants to the city <br />in a give-and-take process referred to as a "peer <br />review." The process ends when both consul- <br />tants agree on the soundness of the analyses. <br />LUCE established a tiered community <br />benefits structure for projects requesting an <br />increase in the base height of 32 feet. There are <br />three tiers. <br />Tier 1 establishes the base height and <br />FAR. No community benefits in addition to the <br />existing ones are required, and the approval <br />process is ministerial. Three to seven extra feet <br />are allowed if affordable housing is provided <br />on-site or close to transit corridors. <br />Tier Description <br />Residential Commercial <br />1 Projects that remain at current height. <br />Projects under increased housing requirements, affordable housing, or other "protected" develop- <br />ment types. <br />$8/GSF $16/GSF <br />2 Projects rezoned with minimal (1-2 story) increase in height. <br />$12/GSF $zo/GSF <br />3 Projects rezoned with significant (3 or more story) increase in height; other designated districts. <br />$16/GSF <br />$24/GSF <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 6.15 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 6 <br />