Laserfiche WebLink
there is no storm sewer infrastructure in place within this easement nor any small utilities either. <br />It appears that there is reasonable space to install a new driveway that meets the minimum required setback of five <br />(5) feet for much of the length of the driveway. Accommodating the parking of any vehicle along the side of the <br />garage would not be feasible without a variance to the setback requirement. Thus, Staff is supportive of a variance <br />to allow the class V gravel surface along the side of the garage as well as a portion of the concrete driveway to <br />encroach into the required setback (angling toward the gravel surface) but not the full length of the driveway. Due to <br />the existence of a ten (10) foot drainage and utility easement, an Encroachment Agreement between the Applicant <br />and the City would be necessary. Engineering Staff has stated that they would be supportive of a partial <br />encroachment but would have concern with the entire width of easement being improved with concrete. <br />When contemplating a variance request, there is a three (3) factor test for practical difficulties that must be met by <br />the Applicant. The following are the three (3) factors: <br />1. Is the property owner proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner? <br />2. Is the landowner's problem due to circumstances unique to the property and not caused by the landowner? <br />3. If granted, would the variance alter the essential character of the locality? <br />Parking a vehicle or piece of equipment along the side of an attached garage is reasonable and commonplace. The <br />wooded setting of the adjacent property provides good screening of this area from the home and thus, it doesn't <br />appear that it would truly alter the essential character of the locality. However, there seems to be sufficient space for <br />a majority of the length of the driveway to meet the required setback before needing to encroach into it to <br />accommodate parking a vehicle. <br />As a reminder, the Planning Commission acts in a quasi-judicial capacity when considering variances rather than a <br />providing a recommendation. <br />Alternative #1: Approve Resolutions #15-07-164 and #15-07-165 approving a variance to allow a portion of a <br />driveway to encroach upon a required setback contingent upon execution of an Encroachment Agreement. The <br />desire to park a vehicle along the side of the garage is reasonable and would help screen the large RV from public <br />view. However, it appears that there is sufficient space to meet the required five (5) foot setback for majority of the <br />length of the driveway. Staff believes that this option represents a reasonable compromise that would allow the <br />Applicant to continue to store their RV along the side of the garage. As drafted, the Variance would allow the <br />concrete driveway to begin angling out toward the property line (at a 45 degree angle) fifteen (15) feet in front of <br />the garage to provide some maneuvering space. Staff supports this option. <br />Alternative #2: Approve modified versions of Resolutions #15-07-164 and #15-07-165 approving a variance to <br />allow the entire length of the proposed driveway to be right up to the lot line contingent upon execution of an <br />Encroachment Agreement. While this may make it easier for the Applicant to pull in and back out with a large RV <br />(provides a straight shot), there appears to be sufficient space to meet the required setback with the exception of <br />where the vehicle would actually be stored. While the parking area is gravel, the majority of the driveway will be <br />concrete. If utilities were ever to be located within this easement, or if the area was ever needed to address drainage <br />issues, that becomes more challenging and costly with concrete in place. Staff does not support this option. If the <br />Applicant desires this width of driveway, Staff would recommend an Administrative Subdivision to shift the <br />common property line to allow for the required setback. <br />Alternative #3: Do not approve the request for a variance. This option would require all portions of the driveway <br />(existing gravel and proposed concrete) to meet the minimum required setback of five (5) feet. By default, this <br />action would eliminate the ability to park a vehicle or equipment along the side of the garage. Additionally, an <br />Encroachment Agreement would still be necessary as the driveway would still encroach five (5) feet into the <br />drainage and utility easement. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the Applicant's responsibility. <br />Recommendation: <br />