My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/10/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/10/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:23:39 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 10:48:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/10/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission 5. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 09/10/2015 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Request for an Amended Conditional Use Permit on the Property Located at 6530 Green Valley Road <br />NW; Case of Green Valley Greenhouse <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Green Valley Greenhouse (the "Applicant"), which is located at 6530 Green Valley Road NW (the "Subject <br />Property), is currently operating under a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) that was approved on September 27, 2005. <br />The Applicant has approached the City was a request to amend their current CUP to allow for an additional 99,176 <br />square feet of building coverage and to reduce a required buffer yard no -build area along the eastern boundary of the <br />Subject Property to address an existing encroachment. <br />Notification: <br />In accordance with State statute, Staff attempted to notify property owners within 350 feet of the subject property of <br />the public hearing via Standard US Mail. The Public Hearing was also noticed in the Anoka County Union Herald, <br />the City's official newsletter for public notices. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The current CUP allows up to 572,855 square feet of building coverage and also requires a 'no -build' buffer yard of <br />sixty-five (65) feet around the entire perimeter of the Subject Property. This buffer area is intended to provide some <br />separation between adjacent residential uses and the commercial nature of this operation. <br />The proposed new building will be located in the southwest portion of the Subject Property and would comply with <br />the sixty-five (65) foot no -build buffer yard requirement. The proposed structure is very similar to the individual <br />hoop structures that exist on the Subject Property. However, rather than individual hoop structures, each would be <br />connected via a gutter. Thus, inside, it will function as one large hoop structure (open floor layout). The exterior <br />finish of the proposed hoop structure will consist of two (2) layers of poly material that are inflated and typically <br />need to be replaced every five (5) years or so. <br />Based on the Applicant's submittal information, there is currently 572,446 square feet of building coverage on the <br />Subject Property. The proposed connected hoop house, along with a small building addition (2,000 square feet), <br />would ultimately add another 99,176 square feet of building coverage to the site, which equates to 38.5% building <br />coverage on the Subject Property. <br />As part of this request, the Applicant is also seeking to reduce the 'no -build' buffer yard area along the eastern <br />boundary of the Subject Property to address an existing encroachment. While the existing CUP allowed for certain <br />expansions to occur, there has not been a survey submitted to verify that the square footage or buffer yard standards <br />have been complied with. It appears that a fifty (50) foot buffer yard along the eastern boundary would sufficiently <br />address the existing encroachment but Staff recommends that a Certificate of Survey be submitted with the Zoning <br />Permit Application to verify this. <br />Due to the size of the proposed addition, it appears that the Applicant will be required to obtain a Lower Rum River <br />Water Management Organization permit, should the requested amendment be approved. <br />Alternatives <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.