My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/10/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/10/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:23:39 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 10:48:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/10/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minn. Stat. § 469.177, subd. 8. <br />Lake Superior Paper Indus. v. <br />State, 624 N.W.2d 254 (Minn. <br />2001). Brookfield Trade Center, <br />Inc. v. County of Ramsey, 609 <br />N.W.2d 868 (Minn. 1998). <br />See Minn. Stat. §§ 469.177, <br />subds. lb, 11, Minn. Stat. § <br />469.1771, subd. 1. Minn. Stat. § <br />469.1793. Minn. Stat. § <br />469.1814. <br />Minn. Stat. § 469.174. <br />Minn. Stat. § 469.175. <br />Walser Auto Sales, Inc. v. City of <br />Richfield, 635 N.W.2d 391 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2001); all' d, 644 <br />N.W.2d 425 (Minn. 2002) <br />Chenoweth v. City of New <br />Brighton, 655 N.W.2d 821 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2003). <br />CHAPTER 15 <br />The TIF agreement with the developer is a complex document. Assistance <br />from a financial advisor and the city attorney is necessary in order to <br />anticipate the many potential problems. An agreement can establish a <br />minimum market value for tax increment assessment purposes, as well as <br />provide that the developer pay a certain level of taxes regardless of any <br />classification rate changes or levy decreases. The agreement should be <br />entered into before the assembly and acquisition of the land on which the <br />completed improvements are to be located. <br />The 2001 tax reform legislation, which reduced class rates and provided for <br />the state takeover of the general education levy, resulted in several changes <br />to various statutes to accommodate the changes. These changes considerably <br />reduce the continued viability of TIF in the future. <br />The law imposes a 180 -day statute of limitations on actions to challenge the <br />creation or modification of a TIF district. The law is complex including a <br />"but -for" finding before a city approves a TIF plan and the creation of a TIF <br />district. Cities must follow statutory requirements including but not limited <br />to administrative expenses, plan modifications, reporting requirements, use <br />of increment in pre -1979 districts, excess increments, pooling, <br />decertification, and use of funds outside the district. <br />Before a district can be created, the law requires a detailed estimate of the <br />impact of a proposed district on city -provided services, such as police and <br />fire protection, public infrastructure, and borrowing costs attributable to the <br />district, in addition to other complex estimations must be prepared. <br />Cities should use extreme care in establishing a TIF district and should <br />follow all procedural requirements; otherwise, a court may find the district <br />was not properly established. In one case, a TIF district was not properly <br />established where minimal effort was made to ensure the thorough <br />inspection of the properties, inaccurate methodology was used to establish <br />the condition of the buildings, and the buildings found structurally <br />substandard were not reasonably distributed throughout the district. <br />In another case, a cause of action for inverse condemnation does not arise <br />where a city's involvement with an adjacent property owner's development <br />consists of establishing a TIF district, entering into a contract with a private <br />developer specifying the size and value of structures to be built, and <br />providing for substantial city assistance to facilitate development. <br />Given the complexity of the laws governing the use of TIF, cities or HRAs <br />should not undertake this method of financing community development <br />projects without the advice of an attorney and professional consultants. <br />15:16 <br />This chapter last revised 12/1/2012 <br />LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.