Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #15-10-247 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH ON <br />THE REQUIRED FENCE HEIGHT LIMIT AT 5650 156th LANE NW AND DECLARING <br />TERMS OF SAME <br />WHEREAS, Walter Gleb and Sandy Warner, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as <br />the "Permittee," have properly applied for a variance from Section 117-111 (R-1 Residential <br />District) of the Ramsey City Code to encroach on the required height limit for a fence on the <br />property generally known as 5650 156th Lane NW and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 25, Block 3, Wildlife Sanctuary 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota <br />(the "Subject Property"). <br />AND WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on October 15, <br />2015, pursuant to Section 117-53 of the Ramsey City Code. <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1. That based on Findings of Fact #0953, a Variance to allow a fence higher than eight (8) feet <br />on the Subject Property is hereby granted. <br />2. That the Permittee shall be required to obtain a Building Permit for the fence. <br />3. That the fence shall be inspected and fence height shall not exceed thirteen (13) feet as measure <br />from grade to top of structure. <br />4. That the Permittee is responsible for accurately locating the property line of the Subject <br />Property for the fence. <br />5. That the Permittee shall maintain positive drainage and existing grades along the westerly <br />property line of the Subject Property. <br />6. That the Permittee shall be responsible for all costs incurred in administering and enforcing <br />this Variance. <br />7. That this Variance shall automatically expire if the use is not initiated by October 15, 2016 <br />and issuance of the Building Permit shall constitute initiation. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />