Laserfiche WebLink
Applicant would still likely want to have a driving surface to access that location which would still require a <br />variance. The Applicant has also stated that they believe parking the trailer on the driveway extension presents a <br />better image than if it were parked in the rear yard on the grass. This option would require the Applicant to remove <br />the fill and retaining wall that are within the required setback area. Staff does not support this option. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the Applicant's responsibility. <br />Recommendation: <br />Considering the duration that the driveway extension has been in place already with no known issues, Staff would <br />recommend approval of the Variance contingent upon the driveway extension surface being upgraded to comply <br />with current City Code standards and upon the Applicant entering into an Easement Encroachment Agreement with <br />the City. <br />Action: <br />Motion to adopt Resolutions #15-11-270 and #15-11-271 granting a variance to the standard driveway setback on <br />the Subject Property. <br />Site Location Map <br />Applicant's Site Plan <br />Aerial View of Subject Property <br />Letter of Support from Neighbor <br />Photos of Subject Property <br />Findings of Fact: Draft Resolution #15-11-270 <br />Variance: Draft Resolution #15-11-271 <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill JoAnn Shaw 11/04/2015 10:54 AM <br />Chris Anderson (Originator) Chris Anderson 11/04/2015 12:34 PM <br />Form Started By: Chris Anderson Started On: 10/28/2015 04:34 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 11/04/2015 <br />