Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 5. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 09/15/2015 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Consideration of Recommending City Council Approval of Master Partnership Contract with Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation for TH 47 Pedestrian Crossing Improvements <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider recommending City Council approval of a Master Partnership Contract with <br />the Minnesota Department of Transportation to allow for future partnering on joint maintenance projects within the <br />City of Ramsey. <br />Background: <br />The Public Works Committee is asked to provide a recommendation to the City Council for approving a Master <br />Partnership Contract (MPC) with Mn/DOT for the purpose of partnering with the City of Ramsey to complete <br />future maintenance projects within City limits. The Master Partnership Contract provides a framework for <br />Mn/DOT and Local Agencies to provide payment to each other for services rendered. A few routine services are <br />included in the contract and all other services are accomplished through the execution of work orders. <br />The first project the Mn/DOT Master Partnership Contract would likely be utilized on is the Trunk Highway 47 <br />(TH 47) pedestrian crosswalk improvements on the north side of the intersection of TH 47 and CSAH 5/Nowthen <br />Boulevard. Attached are two design alternatives for the proposed improvements. This project is proposed to be <br />constructed this fall by having Mn/DOT construct the new crosswalk push-button pedestal, signal revision, and <br />striping work using their contractor, which would then be billed directly to the City. City staff would then be <br />responsible for constructing the concrete pedestrian curb ramp improvements. City staff will meet with Mn/DOT <br />staff in the field on Thursday, September 17 th, to iron out the final design details and to estimate project costs, <br />which will then be presented to the City Council for consideration of approval at the September 22 nd regular <br />Council meeting. <br />Also attached is a copy of the Master Partnership Contract, as well as a cover letter from MnDOT summarizing the <br />purpose and benefits of the MPC. <br />Timeframe: <br />It is estimated it will take 10 to 15 minutes to present and discuss this case. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Observations: <br />The City Attorney was in the process of reviewing the attached Master Partnership Contract (MPC) at the time this <br />case was published. While Staff anticipates that the City Attorney will support a recommendation to the City <br />Council to approve the attached Contract without modifications, the City Attorney's recommendation will be <br />presented at the PWC meeting. <br />The MPC contains specific sections of language that the Committee may wish to address when making their <br />recommendation to the City Council such as "Work Orders do not need City Council approval unless the City <br />Council stipulates that in their resolution. Generally only the City Engineer needs to sign Work Orders." and "Also <br />required is a new resolution passed by the City Council authorizing its officials to sign and execute the agreement <br />on its behalf. (Only the named officials may sign the agreement: if anyone else signs in the named official's place, <br />