Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee <br />Meeting Date: 10/20/2015 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />5. 2. <br />Title: <br />Consider Request for Amendment to Private Improvement in 161st Avenue Within Sweetbay Ridge <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City has received a request from Clint Seul, a resident in Sweetbay Ridge, to consider allowing the placement <br />of landscape rock in the landscaped center median of 161st Avenue. The City has acknowledged value for these <br />enhancements to residential neighborhoods, but placed the maintenance responsibility on individual developments. <br />The condition of these improvements in this neighborhood has begun to deteriorate due to lack of maintenance <br />activities. <br />The Applicant has secured the services of a landscape contractor to work pro-bono on this project, of which time is <br />of the essence to retain these services. Given the requested timeline, Staff wanted to get this request in front of the <br />Committee for broad policy discussion rather than waiting for the overarching policy discussion to be completed. <br />Timeframe: <br />15 Minutes <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />As part of the approval for Sweetbay Ridge, the City allowed the Developer of Sweetbay Ridge to construct private <br />improvements within the public right of way. The improvement provided an amenity for the development in an <br />attempt to create a quality residential neighborhood. The intent was to be managed by a Home Owners Association. <br />Unfortunately, there is not an active HOA in place for this development at this time that is actively managing this <br />improvement. <br />An irrigation system exists within the median. However, it is uncertain if the system is functioning or damaged due <br />to lack of maintenance. The City no longer installs the water meter for the system, as past bills have failed to be <br />paid. <br />The previous Public Works Committee Case outlines a framework to develop a policy that will provide clearer <br />direction to Staff when responding to these types of requests in the future. Unfortunately, since said policy will not <br />yet be in place, the City must review this as a case-by-case basis. <br />Staff is in agreement that a longer term, more sustainable maintenance plan should be in place for this existing <br />improvement. The following are talking points discussed with Staff when reviewing the current request: <br />1. The proposed river rock may accelerate the degredation of existing vegetation within the center median. <br />2. The proposed river rock may spill over the curb line into the paved section of the roadway. <br />3. Mulch requires a more frequent maintenance and replacement schedule. <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative 1. Allow the replacement of the existing mulch with a material to be approved by the Public Works <br />Superintendent. Given the lack of an existing policy and design standards, this appears to be the most appropriate <br />course of action at this time. <br />Alternative 2. Allow the placement of river rock on top of existing mulch as currently proposed. An analysis of this <br />