Laserfiche WebLink
5.01: Consider Request to Reconstruct Stormwater Treatment Improvements at Sunfish <br />Lake <br />City Engineer Westby reviewed the staff report and noted the property owners are present at the <br />meeting. He explained the original purpose of the swale was to keep the solid waste from <br />entering the wetland. The intent of the easement was to allow the City to maintain the swale as <br />needed over time. He noted the swale has not needed maintenance by the City since it was put <br />in. He explained one of the more cost effective resolutions is to construct a settling basin with <br />overflow that would allow the sediment to settle over time. He said he is not sure that this will <br />be a permanent solution but it would reduce some of the water in the swale for the long term. <br />The cost will be between $15,000 and $45,000. The price difference is dependent on the size of <br />the basin, wetland mitigation credits, and on the turf restoration method. He pointed out this is a <br />system that was constructed and is operating as intended. The property owners have requested <br />the City complete the work of constructing a settling basin, and pay for the construction, since <br />the swale cannot be maintained by the property owner and their property is compromised. He <br />mentioned that the basin may need occasional cleaning over the next 50 years; however, it likely <br />wouldn't need it more than a few times. <br />Chairperson Riley introduced property owners, Jay and Suzanne Bergevin, 14520 Sunfish Lake <br />Drive. <br />Mr. Bergevin explained when they purchased the home, it was described as having a drainage <br />ditch. It worked to drain water and functioned as a ditch for many years. He said their biggest <br />concern is that there is a change. The drainage worked well for 9 or 10 years. In the last 5 years <br />or so, they have seen it change from a drainage ditch to a pond that is 2 to 3 feet deep. He <br />explained he cannot get to the other side of it to maintain the area around it. He cannot take care <br />of the area that is under water, as wetland vegetation is now growing. He stated the water has <br />not receded over the last 2 years. It has gotten high enough to reach the berm. He said he could <br />not understand how the stormwater could have been vented through his property, and still reach <br />the top of the berm. He noted it doesn't sound like much sediment has been caught at all. He <br />concluded that he thought they have been patient, asking about this for 3 years, and watching it <br />grow to where about 40% of their yard is now unusable. <br />Mrs. Bergevin stated the definition of drainage is that it is not supposed to settle. She noted this <br />was called a drainage easement on the papers, originally, and not a swale as it is called now. The <br />ponding water is muddy, allowing mosquitoes to breed, and now there are fish in the pond. She <br />said it is not a healthy environment. <br />Mr. Bergevin stated this has reduced the quality of life for them. He said they are unable to <br />enjoy backyard events with friends and neighbors. He explained the high water level of the lake <br />in 1983 to 1988 was 858 or 859. He stated it is 864 now. This is impacting beyond the drainage <br />easement. The design of the easement and drainage pond was implemented in the early 1990s. <br />He said they are requesting the City to restore it to what it was. <br />Mrs. Bergevin stated the drainage ditch is clearly not working as it was intended. She said there <br />was a large black pipe pouring water into the lake at one point, but there is no official record of <br />Public Works Committee / September 15, 2015 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />