My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/17/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2015
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/17/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:46:39 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 11:31:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
11/17/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Please review staff recommendation first. If the Council is concerned with the Staff recommendation, below are <br />alternatives to consider: <br />1. Competitively Bid Step 1 of the attached process (rather than select BKV Group now). <br />2. Don't budget for Step 2 in 2016 at this time (wait until 2017 or later). <br />3. Oppose planning for the reconstruction of a replacement Public Works Campus altogether in 2015 (or later). <br />Funding Source: <br />General Fund and Enterprise Funds <br />Recommendation: <br />1. Consider Staff recommendation on how to proceed with the space needs analysis (Step 1 of process). <br />Typically, Staff would recommend completing a RFQ (Request for Quotes) for this type of work. However, a RFQ <br />on a space needs analysis can easily turn into a bidding war between engineering firms; which motivates firms to <br />"undercut" their bid on the space needs analysis in an effort to "buy" later steps of engineering/ architectural <br />services (steps 2-5 outlined in the attachment). Unless a solid reason exists, Cities select the lowest quote on any <br />given project. This situation can result in a lack of service/ quality in work delivered. Additionally, it should be <br />noted, a space needs analysis can be a fairly ambiguous in terms of several items (not easy to compare apples to <br />apples --and challenging to draft a very clear RFQ). <br />As a result of the information outlined above, Staff would feel more comfortable allowing an architectural/ <br />engineering firm that has a good track record with City to complete Step 1 of this process. Then, when it comes to <br />Steps 2-5, staff would recommend architectural/ engineering services for this project be competitively bid (i.e. a <br />standard RFQ process). NOTE: in order for the City to receive quality competitive bids for steps 2-5, the space <br />needs analysis needs to be thorough and of high quality (will make the RFQ very clear). This work is not required to <br />be competitively bid via State Statute. <br />Attached to this case is a proposal from BKV Group for a space needs analysis (not to exceed $19,500). Staff would <br />recommend awarding BKV Group this work. BKV Group has a solid track record with the City (Fire Station #2 <br />and the Ramsey Municipal Center). <br />2. Consider Staff recommendation to budget $65,000 for preliminary design in 2016 (Step 2 of process). <br />As the Council knows, in order to complete a project in 2016, we need to budget for that project in 2015. If the <br />Council is interested in moving this project along in 2016, Staff would recommend budgeting for Step 2 <br />(Preliminary Design) now. Staff was provided a "preliminary/ budgeting" estimation of $55,000 for this work by <br />BKV Group. Staff would recommend the City Council budget $65,000 for Step 2 in 2016. <br />Action: <br />Motion to: <br />Accept the attached proposal for professional services from BKV Group, not to exceed $19,500. <br />-and- <br />Direct Staff to budget $65,000 in 2016 for preliminary design of a replacement Public Works Campus. <br />Campus REF MAP (Two Options) <br />Process Outline <br />BKV Group Proposal (Step 1 Space Needs) <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.