Laserfiche WebLink
9. That there are two (2) current signs on the Subject Property that were previously approved by CUP: a <br />90 square foot sign that is twenty five (25) feet in height next to Highway 10 and a twenty three (23) <br />square foot sign that is eight (8) feet high along Riverdale Drive. <br />10. That this CUP will supersede the previous CUP, still allowing two (2) ground signs on the property. <br />11. That the Applicant has provided an exhibit that demonstrates the proposed height and location in <br />relation to the Armstrong Boulevard interchange and the impact of traffic visibility in the area. <br />12. That a conditional use permit to exceed sign size restrictions will/will not grant the Applicant special <br />privileges that are denied by the City Code to other properties in the residential area. <br />13. That the proposed increase in sign square footage will be designed so as to be harmonious and <br />appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the vicinity and will not change <br />the essential character of the area. <br />14. That the proposed increase in sign square footage will not adversely impact traffic in the area. <br />15. That the proposed increase in sign square footage will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise <br />detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br />16. That the proposed increase in sign square footage will not substantially impair the use, enjoyment, or <br />market value of surrounding properties. <br />17. That the proposed increase in sign square footage will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or <br />future neighboring uses. <br />18. That the proposed increase in sign square footage will not create excessive additional requirements at <br />public cost for public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of <br />the community. <br />19. That the proposed increase in sign square footage will not involve activities and uses that will be <br />detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of glare. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Riley, and <br />upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />Mayor Strommen <br />Councilmember LeTourneau <br />Councilmember Riley <br />Councilmember Johns <br />Councilmember Kuzma <br />Councilmember Shryock <br />Councilmember Williams <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />None <br />RESOLUTION #15-11-272 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />