Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission 5. 7. <br />Meeting Date: 04/09/2015 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Ordinance #15-08 Amending Off -Street Parking Regulations <br />Purpose/Background: <br />City Code Section 117-355 (Residential Development Off -Street Parking) currently outlines permissible locations <br />for parking motor vehicles and equipment on residential lots. There are different standards for lots less than two (2) <br />acres in size then there are for lots two (2) acres or larger in size. The purpose of this proposed amendment is to <br />consider a standardized setback for parking motor vehicles and/or equipment in the side and rear yard of residential <br />lots, regardless of their size. <br />Notification: <br />The Public Hearing was published in the Anoka County UnionHerald. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Presently, on residential properties less than two (2) acres in size, City Code requires that all motor vehicles and <br />equipment parked in the side and rear yards be closer to the principal structure than the property boundary. The <br />intent was to try and limit visibility of stored vehicles/equipment from adjacent properties. In theory this seemed <br />reasonable, however, application of this standard has proven to be impractical and hasn't necessarily accomplished <br />the intended goal. <br />On residential properties that are two (2) acres or greater in size, motor vehicles and equipment parked in the side or <br />rear yard of a property are required to be at least fifteen (15) feet from the property boundary. This provision was <br />simply to ensure that items were not parked right along a property boundary. <br />The proposed amendment would simplify the off-street parking standards regarding where items (motor vehicles <br />and equipment) can be parked on a residential lot by establishing a base setback of five (5) feet from side and rear <br />property lines regardless of property size. This is compatible with the current setback requirement for driveways, <br />which is applicable regardless of property size and residential zoning district. Under current regulations, a motor <br />vehicle parked on a lawful driveway in the side or rear yard of a property could still be in violation of the off-street <br />parking ordinance if the vehicle was either closer to the property line than the home (in the MUSA District) or <br />within fifteen (15) feet of the side/rear property line (Rural Developing District). The proposed amendment would <br />eliminate this contradiction. <br />Ideally, additional parking area would be accommodated along the side of a garage. However, attached and <br />detached accessory buildings must maintain a minimum setback of at least six (6) feet (MUSA District) or ten (10) <br />feet (Rural Developing District), oftentimes resulting in insufficient space to accommodate a driveway extension <br />that meets the driveway setback and that does not encroach within a drainage and utility easement. Thus, while the <br />proposed amendment wouldn't solve this, it does not result in additional obstacles for individuals trying to <br />accommodate off-street parking needs. <br />Alternatives <br />Option 1: Recommend that City Council adopt Ordinance #15-08 amending the off-street parking regulations by <br />establishing a consistent setback of five (5) feet for parking motor vehicles and equipment on residential properties, <br />