Laserfiche WebLink
MMKR <br />CERT IFIEI? PUBLIC <br />ACCOUN'FANTS <br />INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT <br />ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br />To the City Council and Management <br />City of Ramsey, Minnesota <br />PRINCIPALS <br />Thomas M_ Montague, CPA <br />Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA <br />Paul A. Radosevich, CPA <br />William J. Lauer, CPA <br />James H. Eichren, CPA <br />Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA <br />Victoria L. Holinka, CPA <br />We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of <br />America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, <br />issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental <br />activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of <br />the City of Ramsey, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the related <br />notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and <br />have issued our report thereon dated May 21, 2015. <br />MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br />The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, promulgated by the Office of <br />the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be <br />tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, <br />claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered <br />all of the listed categories. <br />In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to <br />comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, <br />except as described in the Schedule of Findings and Responses as items 2014-001 and 2014-002. <br />However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. <br />Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention <br />regarding the City's noncompliance with the above referenced provisions. <br />CITY'S RESPONSES TO FINDINGS <br />The City's responses to the legal compliance findings identified in our audit have been included in the <br />Schedule of Findings and Responses. The City's responses were not subject to the auditing procedures <br />applied in our audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. <br />PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT <br />The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of <br />that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any <br />other purpose. <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />May 21, 2015 <br />-I- <br />Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., P.A. <br />5353 Wayzata Boulcvard • Suite 410 • Minncapalis. MW 55416 • Tclephunc. 952-545.0424 - Tcicfav 953.545-4569 • www.mmkr.com <br />