My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 08/17/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2015
>
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 08/17/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:17:22 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 11:53:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
08/17/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Gladhill stated this all originated from a joint meeting. One of <br />the questions from that meeting was what is the goal for that development. Sometimes it feels like <br />there are multiple goals. He asked if the development should happen quickly so it can get on the <br />tax role, or if the consensus is to wait for the long term vision to come. <br />Board Member Bentz commented the issue is with the interchange. People do not like using <br />frontage roads because they are difficult to use. The interchange does not seem welcoming right <br />now. Ramsey has resources to market. If Ramsey wants to attract businesses, we need to look at <br />parking issues when there are events, maybe looking at a water park or other features geared <br />toward families. He said he doesn't see a big box store doing much of anything. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained the Planning Commission is not suggesting <br />the original plan be followed. The Commission acknowledged that was aggressive for the market <br />that is Ramsey. The Commission would like to put together a plan that matches the goals. He said <br />he has hopefully captured some of the additional topics needed for that survey. Each Board has <br />come up with more questions along the way. He said Staff recommends the City Council adopt <br />this document, with the understanding that it will be revised as it goes through the different Boards <br />and Agencies. <br />Motion by Board Member Lewis and seconded by Board Member Valentine to recommend that <br />the City Council adopt the attached Comparison Document for The COR, including the revisions <br />and questions suggested at this meeting. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Stodola, Board Member Lewis, Valentine, Bentz, and <br />Covart. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Members Bernard, and Hiatt. <br />6. BOARD / STAFF INPUT <br />• Receive Presentation from Smart Irrigation Forum <br />The purpose of this case is simply to provide the Board with a copy of the presentation that was <br />offered at the Smart Irrigation Forum hosted by the Anoka County Water Task Force. <br />• Girl Scout Recognition <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated he runs through the north loop frequently. There is a garbage <br />can that the Girl Scouts put up there. He asked if it would be of interest to put a plaque on it <br />recognizing their hard work. <br />City Planner Anderson noted the City had worked with the Girl Scouts to determine how best to <br />recognize their work. They had asked if they could handle the recognition at one point. He said <br />he would be in touch with them. <br />Motion by Board Member Lewis and seconded by Board Member Valentine to recommend that <br />the City follow through with the commitment previously made to acknowledge the work the Girl <br />Scouts have done in the north loop. <br />Environmental Policy Board / August 17, 2015 <br />Page 10 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.