My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 08/17/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2015
>
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 08/17/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:17:22 PM
Creation date
1/19/2016 11:53:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
08/17/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Planner Anderson clarified that what was being suggested was changer the word "natural <br />resources" to "renewable resources". <br />Board Member Covart said she didn't have a concrete suggestion, and just wanted to suggest the <br />word "renewable" be added. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau noted he approved of using the words "natural resources" because it <br />makes people think of natural things. We want to raise awareness of water and renewable <br />resources, and he said he would like to have people be brought into a discussion of how we can <br />address the aquifer and other issues. If the word "renewable" helps open up the conversation, then <br />it should be used. He suggested the question read, "What value does environmental and natural <br />and renewable resources add to your community." He pointed out water is renewable. Trees are <br />somewhat renewable, and compost and recycling is more renewable than natural resources. <br />Chairperson Stodola stated the word "renewable" was redundant. <br />Board Member Bentz commented these words are more along the lines of reclaiming rather than <br />renewable. He suggested creating a statement with the words "renewable" and "reclaimable", as <br />they both fit under the umbrella of "sustainability". He stated a moderator in a discussion may <br />able to suggest words that others may not think of. He said preservation is a large part of this <br />subject, and others may not think of this as sustainable. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated he would like to find words that resonate with the public. <br />Chairperson Stodola noted he had thought over the situation and he would no longer like to keep <br />the word "sustainability" in. He said if the Board is having this much discussion over it, the public <br />could be unsettled. <br />Board Member Lewis suggested the word "sustainability" be replaced with "conservation". He <br />stated it may be more to the point. He clarified the question would then read, "What value do. <br />natural resources and conservation add to your neighborhood?" <br />It was the consensus of the Environmental Policy Board to move ahead with the question: "What <br />value do natural resources and conservation add to your community?" <br />Councilmember LeTourneau asked when this item will come before the Council. <br />City Planner Anderson replied it will be either the 25th of August or the 8th of September. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau suggested this question be posted at Happy Days. <br />City Planner Anderson responded he did plan to have it in place by Happy Days for that reason. <br />He said it would be a great opportunity to get feedback on this, and anything else. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated if there is a lot of confusion over it, the Board can discuss at a <br />future meeting. If people seem to understand it, then we can move forward in discussion of this <br />chapter of the Comp Plan. <br />Environmental Policy Board / August 17, 2015 <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.