Laserfiche WebLink
management practices for any <br />reconstruction of infrastructure to lessen <br />the impact of future disasters and to <br />mitigate the effects of disasters resulting <br />from future extreme weather events. <br />FF -29. Impact Fees <br />Issue: New development and the resulting <br />growth create an increased demand for <br />public infrastructure and other public <br />facilities. Severe constraints on local fiscal <br />resources and dramatic forecasts for <br />population growth have prompted cities to <br />reconsider ways to pay for the inevitable <br />costs associated with new development. <br />Traditional financing methods tend to <br />subsidize new development at the expense <br />of the existing community, discourage sound <br />land -use planning, place inefficient <br />pressures on public facilities, and allow <br />under -utilization of existing infrastructure. <br />Consequently, local communities are <br />exploring methods to ensure new <br />development pays its fair share of the true <br />costs of growth. Given the existing <br />authorization to impose fees on new <br />development for water, sanitary and storm <br />sewer, and park purposes, it is reasonable to <br />extend the concept to additional public <br />infrastructure and facilities improvement <br />also necessitated by new development. <br />Response: The Legislature should <br />authorize local units of government to <br />impose impact fees so new development <br />pays its fair share of the off-site, as well as <br />the on-site, costs of public infrastructure <br />and other public facilities needed to <br />adequately serve new development. <br />FF -30. Library Funding <br />Issue: State law requires that local <br />governments maintain a minimum level of <br />funding for public library services. This is <br />collectively known as "state -certified levels <br />of library support," or more commonly <br />known as, "maintenance of effort (MOE)" <br />and is described in Minn. Stat. § 134.34. <br />A majority of public libraries in Minnesota <br />belong a regional library system, which is <br />the entity that receives library funding from <br />the Minnesota Department of Education. Six <br />of the 12 regional library systems are <br />structured as a federated system where the <br />individual libraries or library systems <br />operate autonomously from the regional <br />library system but they can utilize certain <br />services such as inter -library loan <br />distribution, digital card cataloging, which <br />capitalize on economies of effort from <br />partnering with the other libraries in the <br />regional system. The MOE for cities in a <br />federated library system is now set at 90% <br />of the amount established in 2011 (see <br />Minn. Stat. § 275.761). In 2011, it was <br />calculated using a formula that included <br />payments made in the form of the library <br />employee salaries, payments toward <br />operating the facility, purchasing materials <br />from the library, and other operating costs, <br />adjusted net tax capacity, and several other <br />factors. The other half of the state's public <br />library systems are consolidated systems, <br />where the regional library system runs the <br />libraries through a joint powers agreement <br />with counties and participating cities. The <br />regional library system has a board and hires <br />the director. A city that participates in the <br />regional system will have an MOE <br />(calculated as described above). The city <br />MOE may include dollars provided directly <br />to the regional library system or operating <br />dollars provided to support building costs <br />(i.e. city -provided maintenance services). <br />In the metropolitan area, the seven county <br />library systems and one city library system <br />belong to the Metropolitan Library Services <br />Agency (MELSA), the metro area regional <br />library system. Most of the cities that <br />League of Minnesota Cities <br />2016 City Policies Page 110 <br />