Laserfiche WebLink
Orr Uission: To work together to resposib y grow our community, and to provide quality, cost-effective, and efficient government ierwlcea. <br />CC Regular Session 6. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 01/26/2016 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #16-01-030 Accepting Feasibility Report and Ordering Plans and Specifications for Improvement <br />Project #16-00, Division C; Andrie Street and 164th Lane Reconstruction <br />Purpose/Background: <br />City of Ramsey Improvement Project 16-00 Division C proposes to reconstruct the pavement sections and complete <br />other appurtenant work on two urban street segments connecting Alpine Drive and Jarvis Street through the <br />Northfork development in the southwest corner of the City. The street segments proposed to be reconstructed total <br />approximately 9,990 linear feet (1.89 miles) in length and include Andrie Street (approx. 6,330 linear feet) from <br />Alpine Drive to 164th Lane, and 164th Lane (approx. 3,660 linear feet) from Andrie Street to Jarvis Street. A map <br />showing the location and scope of the proposed improvements is included in Appendix A of the attached Feasibility <br />Report. <br />City staff evaluates and rates the condition of pavement sections on all city streets on an annual basis using the <br />Pavement and Surface Evaluation Rating (PASER) system. In the fall of 2015, the pavement sections of the <br />above -referenced street segments were rated with PASER ratings of 2 ranking them among some of the worst street <br />segments in the City. A PASER rating of 2 also implies that these streets are past the point of applying an overlay so <br />the streets require complete reconstruction. Pictures of these streets are located at the end of Appendix A of the <br />attached Feasibility Report. <br />Both street segments were constructed in 1985 with bituminous pavement and bituminous curbs at a width of 31 <br />feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Minimal storm sewer improvements were also constructed with these <br />streets. Between the bituminous curbing and lack of a sufficient number of catch basins, stormwater runoff did not <br />effectively drain from these streets resulting in the accelerated deterioration of the pavement sections. The condition <br />of these streets is now such that City staff must patch the streets multiple times a year, particularly before winter <br />months so the streets can be plowed without pulling up pieces of pavement in the process. <br />The proposed design outlined in the Feasibility Report provides for reconstructing both streets using B618 concrete <br />curb and gutter, bituminous pavement, storm sewer improvements, and an on -street bike lane on one side of the <br />streets which requires signing and striping improvements. <br />The on -street bike lane, recommended by the Public Works Committee as a compromise to installing concrete <br />sidewalk, which was overwhelmingly opposed by residents in 2008/09 leading to a petition that stopped the project <br />from being constructed at that time, does not allow on -street parking on that side of the street. The proposed <br />improvements outlined in this report therefore include on -street parking bays (bump -outs) along approximately 35% <br />of the project corridor on the opposite side of the streets. <br />Staff received numerous comments and questions from Northfork residents while preparing this report. And per <br />