Laserfiche WebLink
Section 3: Comments Submitted Anonymously <br />Table 5 (below) and the accompanying pie charts show the stated preference of each of <br />the 10 anonymous comments received regarding the presence of bike lanes and parking on <br />Andrie Street and 164th lane. Because these comments lack address information and most of <br />them lack the name of the submitter, it is not possible to ascertain whether they were from <br />assessed or non -assessed properties. Furthermore, it is not possible to ascertain whether any of <br />these comments are duplicates as the same individual could potentially have submitted a <br />comment at each of the three public meetings. A preference for bike lanes should be <br />interpreted as a desire to see dedicated bike lanes. A preference for parking should be <br />interpreted as a desire to see some amount of on -street parking preserved (respondents <br />favored several different amounts of parking preservation). "No Stated Preference" means that <br />the submitted comment did not address the issue. <br />Table 5: Anonymous: 10 Total Responses (Some May be Duplicates) <br />Yes No No Stated Preference <br />Dedicated Bike Lane <br />3 <br />3 4 <br />Parking 4 2 4 <br />Anonymous Responses: Do <br />You Want Bike Lanes? <br />■ Yes ■ No ■ No Stated Preference <br />Anonymous Responses: Do You <br />Want Parking? <br />■ Yes ■ No ■ No Stated Preference <br />Note: Three (3) of the anonymous respondents who did want parking but did not want a <br />dedicated bike lane expressed support for a "multi-purpose lane" that could accommodate on - <br />street parking as well as bikes and pedestrians when vehicles are not parked. <br />5 <br />