Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br />ipeci al. Meeti ng/Counci 1 <br />an ua ry .]t6~ .19Y8 <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Muller to adopt ordinance #78-.1 "An ordinance <br />adopting a revision and codification of ordinances to be known as the <br />Ramsey City Code", <br /> <br />Mayor Cox called for a second, receiving no second, the motion died. <br /> <br />Councilman Gamec asked, the Planning & Zoning Commission members present <br />whether they had had a chance to review the Code and zoning amendments <br />within it. Nereson explained that the Planning Commission had conducted <br />public hearings, adopted findings of fact and forwarded those recommend- <br />ations on to the City Council for their adoption. Members of the Planning <br />and Zoning Commission present indicated that they had reviewed and had <br />input into the zoning changes, and felt comfortable with them. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Muller to adopt Ordinance #78-1 "An ordinance adopt- <br />ing a revision and codification of ordinances to be known as the Ramsey <br />City Code", said motion was duly seconded by Councilman Gamec, whereupon <br />Ordinance #78-1 passed by a unanimous vote. <br /> <br />Discussion of utilities in the 1990 Urban Service Area <br /> <br />Phil Nereson started the discussion by'indicating to the City Council, <br />since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment creating the <br />1990 Urban Service Area, and eventual city involvement in urban size <br />lots with public facilities and improvements, several issues revolving <br />around construction and payment of these improvements needed to be <br />addressed by the City Council. Policies need to be considered relative <br />to when the required improvements will be called for, how they are to <br />be financed, and how will development.will occur until public sewers <br />and waters are actually available. A general discussion was held with <br />explanations coming from Municipal Consultant, Bernard Steffan, and City <br />Engineer Dick Sha, regarding financing mechanisms, development controls, <br />and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, the Special Assessment Procedure. <br />Concern was also raised regarding the Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) <br />payments and how they would be levied. It was the concensus that the <br />City should negotiate with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission to <br />limit SAC charges being collected, only in the 1990 Urban Service Area <br />and ultimately only up to the transitional area, excluding, the Rural <br />Service Area. <br /> <br />The discussion was precipitated by the submission of a preliminary sketch <br />plan from a developer wishing to develop within the 1990 Urban Service <br />Area. It was the concensus of the City Council that the Planning Com- <br />mission should hear any proposed sketch plans and preliminary plats within <br />the 1990 Urban Service Area, prior to actual sewer service being available <br />under one of two options: <br /> <br />1) Allow development and platting on the basis of the urban <br />section zoning, however, restricting development to a density <br />factor of one structure per acre, and requiring the developer <br />to escrow to the City an estimated cost for the future public <br />improvements, for each building permit taken or lot conveyed. <br /> <br /> <br />