Laserfiche WebLink
also looking at a lot of other things. He thinks input from the EPB will be very helpful especially <br />with large projects. He stated that he is in favor of a trial run. <br />Commissioner Maul stated that he felt it was a really good idea from an environmental <br />standpoint and that it would alleviate some issues. <br />City Council Liaison LeTourneau observed that the land use applications for Parkview East <br />Apartments and Common Bond Apartments were reviewed and the thing that came to the surface <br />was the water management system that Common Bond had put in. It was identified as a best <br />management practice. He stated that this is a good example of how this structure can be the <br />shepherd of these issues and the City will start to see consistency in how it is handling surface <br />water and its retention. <br />Community Development Direction Gladhill spoke about the Harvest Estate project and how <br />they were able to apply ordinances that were developed through the EPB. <br />Commissioner Bauer spoke about a recent project that had more than the required number of <br />parking spaces. He stated that the EPB discussions before the Planning Commission's review of <br />the project were helpful. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that the hope is to have this type of feedback built into the review <br />to go to the Planning Commission and then to the City Council. <br />Board Member Valentine stated it would be nice if there could be a feedback loop so that we <br />don't wait too long to find out we are out of sync. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that as Staff they can try to do that. He stated that Staff is going <br />before the EPB and then two weeks later the Planning Commission and then two weeks later the <br />EBP meets again. It could be his responsibility to relay the general conversations rather than <br />waiting a full year. He will try to serve as a go between. <br />Chairperson Levine stated that this is already being done but now it will be more purposeful and <br />will keep both commissions on track. <br />5.02: Review Development Review Process and Meeting Procedures <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that he would like to give a broad overview of <br />the land use application process. He stressed the importance of learning the structure of code <br />and being able to find the information Board Members/Commissioners need. He stated that City <br />ordinances come from state statute and constitution, He stated that the League of Minnesota <br />Cities is a great resource and encouraged Board Members and Commissioners to attend a <br />Governance Training Services function. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill went over zoning and subdivision codes and the <br />Planning and Zoning Discretionary Pyramid and how is it is used. He stated that the Planning <br />Commission is the recommending body to the City Council with the exception of variances in <br />which the Planning Commission is acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals and they <br />actually make the approval or denial of variances. The Planning Commission's decisions are <br />Environmental Policy Board / April 20, 2015 <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />