11/03/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

satisfy frost footing requirements; 5) will not develop on that additional 7 feet of property needed by the city for future construction of Front Street in exchange for a variance to setback now necessary because of additional easements needed and will deed that easement to the city when it becomes necessary; 6) would like a 30 foot variance to the 35 foot rear yard setback so that the 3 new buildings will be placed uniformly with the 3 existing buildings on Lot 2 and both lots would be accessed on the northwest side of Lot 1 from 138th and the Ebony access closed. Ms. Norris noted that with the additional 7 feet of easement needed, a variance would not be necessary if the property were developed fronting on Ebony and side yard on 138th. Mr. Dubats stated he paid more for this particular lot because an entrance to the business on 138th would be visible from Hwy. #10. Mr. Dubats stated that he would be willing to deed the additional 7 foot easement required if he could have is business access from 138th. Commissioner Shumway stated that how the access from 138th would relate to Hwy.#10 stacking distance should be reviewed by the County and the State. Mr. Goodrich suggested that the City Engineer and Building Official review whether or not a reinforced slab satisfies frost footing requirements. Mr. Goodrich stated that legally there can be a common driveway for two separate lots of record by way of a variance; common driveway makes good planning sense. The Commission proceeded to review the proposed findings of fact. Motion by Commissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Rolm to recommend that City Council adopt findings of fact relating to Mr. Bill Dubats' request for a conditional use permit with the following amendments: Item #11 should read as follows: 'That the proposed use will increase traffic into and from the subject property.' Add Item #21 to read as follows: 'That written comments were received from Mr. Joseph Sentyrz dated October 30, 1987 indicating no objection to the construction of a self-service storage facility as long as the owners are required to build a building that at least meets or exceeds the standards imposed on other commercial development in the area.' Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chairman Hendriksen, Commissioners Shumway, LaDue, Holm and Terry. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairman Zimmerman and Commissioner Howell. The Commission proceeded to review the proposed conditional use permit. Mr. Dubats stated that he feels requiring an escrow for blacktopping is not necessary as blacktopping is a very essential amenity to the business and is a task included in the 6 week construction period. Mr. Goodrich stated that the escrow assures the city that required improvements will be completed; escrow will be required at the time the building permit is pulled and returned when the project is complete. P & Z/November 3, 1987 Page 4 of 7