Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />As a member of the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee, and as an interested citizen, I <br />~ttended the Public Hearing on February 8. I recognize that the purpose of <br />the Committee and the proposed ordinance was Lo recommend policy Lo pay for <br />public improvements, if they are needed. The policies should not, In my <br />opinion, be viewed either as a vehicle for or justification for "forcing" im- <br /> <br />provements into an area -- residential, commercial, or industrial. IRamsey is <br />lucky in that we did have this opportunity to plan before major improvement <br />projects are initiated. The hearing was held Lo educate and receive input <br />from the public on the proposed policy. How well that was done is debatable'. <br /> <br /> I am concerned that the general feeling is that, with the adoption of this <br /> <br /> proposed ordinance, the planning is completed. Yes, we hav~ planned, in <br /> general, how Lo pay the contractors, bonding agents., engineers, eLe. for <br /> <br /> building the projects, but ... what about operating and maintaining the sys- <br /> <br /> tems. As soon as the first sewer lateral is hooked up, we're in LISe 'sewer <br /> billing business. As soon as the first well is in and operating, we're in <br /> <br /> the water business -- operating pumphouses, chemical feed equipment, flushing <br /> <br />lines, thawing and repairing frozen lines. Who is going to do the billing? <br />Are we planning ~ or will we need~ Lo have a sewer and water superintendent? If <br /> <br />improvements go in, should we anticipate a substantial impact on development <br />that will require added police staff? Will existing or potential i~dustries <br />LA be provided with sewer and water "demand" city fire protection? Granted, <br />"development" may start slowly, but let's not ignore the potential impacts on <br />increased city staffing which, whether a person has sewer or water or not, is <br />reflected in local taxes. ,- . .' <br /> <br />I am also concerned that at least the citizens Who attended .the hearing are- <br />convinced that they won't see the impacts Of sewer and water for "many years". <br />The potential impacts could be felt sooner than perceived. With developers <br />holding on to heretofore undeveloped lands, they (/ expect) see the advent Of <br />sewer and water as the mechanism to finally develop their property, sell lots <br />and, hopefully, make some money. I am not faulting them for that. But, it is <br /> <br />my guess that the wheels are already turning for more than one such area in <br />the city. The City. Engineer and Mayor both Said, at the hearing, that work on <br />sewer in Ftamsey could, theoretically, begin in April -- that's only 5 weeks <br /> <br />away! Even if the first improvements occur in non-existing residential areas <br /> <br />or even commercial/industrial areas, the impact could be felt by everyone in <br /> <br /> <br />