My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/22/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 02/22/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 11:56:52 AM
Creation date
5/18/2004 9:06:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/22/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />Sick Leave - The police bargaining unit wanted changes in this area. <br />The City Administrator recommended no changes until the City had an <br />opportunity to review its sick leave practice. <br /> <br />5) <br /> <br />Funeral Leave - The police bargaining unit wanted a change in this <br />area. The City Administrator recommended that the Council Personnel <br />Committee not get into this in the 1983 bargaining. <br /> <br />6) <br /> <br />Injured on Duty - The police bargaining unit wanted to add this into <br />the police negotiating package. The City Administrator recommended <br />that the Council Personnel Committee not get into this area during the <br />1983 bargaining sess£on.' <br /> <br />Discussion: Councilman Reimann stated that he wanted .to know the total breakdown <br />on the wage'package that was being proposed as tentative offer recommendation <br />that they should consider offering police bargaining unit. The City Administrator <br />reiterated that it represented a 3%% adjustment and 5%% cost of living. He stated <br />that other non-union employees adjustments varied according to their position, <br />but they all received a 5% cost of living increase and openers to the package <br />come July 1, 1983. The additional %% being offered to the police was a substitute <br />for the opener clause given to the non-union employees. The City Administrator <br />stated that he could agree with Councilman Reimann in part but he felt his <br />recommendation better protected the Cit~ of Ramsey. Councilman Reimann stated he <br />would only consider 8%% (which represented 3%% adjustment and 5% cost of living) <br />as a tentative wage offer. <br /> <br />Councilman Reimann stated that he would go along with the tentative offer of an <br />additional % day holiday which would be taken as a ~ day off on December 24th. <br />The City Administrator stated that the tentative % day offer should be for all <br />City employees. Councilman R~imann stated that he agreed with that as he didn't <br />want to create an ~n~alance of fringe benefits. ~ <br /> <br />Councilman Sorteberg stated that he had mixed feelings on the recommendation <br />submitted by the City Administrator on a tentative salary offer and what Councilman <br />Reimann felt it should be. He stated he would go along with Councilman Reimann's <br />tentative offer. Councilman Sorteberg stated he would also go along with the % <br />day additional holiday on December 24th. <br /> <br />The City Administrator stated that they would take'the Council Personnel Committee's <br />tentative offer back to the police bargaining unit. <br /> <br />Case #2: Personnel Staffing: <br /> <br />City Administrator Schnelle stated he was coming to the Personnel Committee on this <br />problem as it was really devel?ping into a serious problem in the areas Of the <br />Public Works Department and the Accounting Department. <br /> <br />He stated that he wanted the Personnel Committee to approve of adding one Light <br />Equipment Operator person to the Public Works Department and adding one Accounting/ <br />Data Processing Clerk I tothe Accounting Department. The Administrator stated that <br />the Public Worksman was included in the 1983 Budget, however, the Accounting/Data <br />Processing Clerk I was not included in the 1983 Budget. He stated that the reason <br />it wasn't included is that the office has tried various cost cutting methods to <br />keep from it. However, he stated that there are just too many things occurring <br />in Ramsey that are beyond his and Council's control. The money for this Accounting/ <br />Data Processing Clerk I will come from the excess in budget salaries and the <br />Administrative Fund. <br /> <br />Personnel Committee <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> February 16~ 1983 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.