My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/31/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 05/31/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 11:58:40 AM
Creation date
5/18/2004 10:32:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/31/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
360
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Council reviews any proposed ordinances or restrictions using cri- <br />teria contained in its solid waste policy plan (pages 59 and 60). <br /> <br />The review is done to ensure the operation of the regional solid waste <br />management system is not adversely affected by a-local ordinance° How- <br />ever, the Council should provide sample ordinances for local regulation <br />of solid' waste disposal facilities. <br /> <br />Following is a discussion of the potential impacts of landfills and <br />resource recovery facilities on the host community. <br /> <br />INCREASED TRUCK TRAFFIC AND ROAD MAINTENANCE <br /> <br />Operating a sanitary landfill or resource recovery facility in a commu- <br />nity will increase the number'of trucks on the community's roads. If the <br />road leading to a facility is a state, county or state-aid highway, the <br />additional truck traffic would have a negligible impact on the local com- <br />munity because it's a small percentage of all traffic on those routes. <br /> <br />If all or a portion of the route is a municipal or township road, however <br />the impact is much greater. Municipalities should not have to pay to <br />upgrade roads for a facility that benefits the entire Region. The county <br />or owner of the waste facility should assume responsibility for the imme- <br />diate access roads to the waste facility~ including the costs of upgrad- <br />ing to the necessary.weight limit. In addition, the county or waste <br />facility owner shall compensate the local unit of government for extra- <br />ordinary road maintenance costs incident to facility use. <br /> <br />NUISANCE IMPACTS--NOISE, LITTER, RODENTS <br /> <br />A certain amount of noise is associated with any sanitary landfill <br />because of equipment and trucks entering and leaving the fill area. The <br />noise impact is generally limited to the hours of operation and depends <br />on the proximity of homes, schools, and other institutions adjacent to <br />the facility or truck route. It also depends on the sensitivity of <br />people adjacent to the noise source and the level of truck maintenance <br />and upkeep. Noise from a landfill can be reduced by the design and size <br />of the buffer zone. <br /> <br />Similarly, noise at a resource recovery facility will depend on the <br />amount of truck traffic. Noise can be controlled by locating the facil- <br />ity in an industrial area and away from noise-sensitive land uses. Fur- <br />thermore, most resource recovery facilities, particularly waste-to-energy <br />plants, are inside buildings, which reduces noise levels from the <br />facility. <br /> <br />Scattering litter and debris or blowing sludge ash are associated with <br />the day-to-day operation of a landfill. Scattering and blowing will be <br />influenced by wind speed and direction, the amount of waste uncovered, <br />the type of cover material and the local topography. It can be a problem <br /> <br />.I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.