Laserfiche WebLink
local unit of government, school district and special taxing, districts <br />annually during a facility.~.s operation. The payment should be calculated <br />at the curren'{ s~ar mill rate~ an~ should be over and above any statutorZ <br />levy limitations.- The taxes or PILOT should be based on an industrial <br />property tax classification rate. The industrial classification permits <br />application of the highest tax rate allowable. <br /> <br />In principle, the PILOT should be paid by the users of the landfill or <br />resource recovery facility--that is, the waste generators. Th~ paymen~ <br />can be accomplished by a taxing mechanism requiring the coun~t~ or other <br />p.u~lic bodS to compensate the mu~icip.ality or townshi~ the amount of <br />taxes levied thereon for municipal or township purposes based on an indus- <br />tria'l property tax classification rate or the countS shall contract with <br />the municipalits.gr township for a PILOT. <br /> <br />Waste facilities, particularly landfills, create some uncertainty about <br />the future value of the land and adjacent properties, not to mention <br />other adverse environmental or socioeconomic impacts upon the host com- <br />munity. Consequently, the Legislature should require all owners of solid <br />waste facilities to compensate the municipality or township for host!ng <br />the facility. The Legislature should establish compensation based upon a <br />percentage of the weight, volume or gross receipts of the waste facil- <br />ity. The mechanism for payment should be determined through negotiation <br />between the waste facilitx, owner and the local unit of government. The <br />mechanism maS include a lump sum pasmegt~ annual payment or other <br />mutuallS acceptable condition. If an a~reement cannot be reached~ the <br />Legislature should grant the Council the authority to establish an agree- <br />ment. <br /> <br />The advisory committee could not agree on how to determine the amount of <br />compensation to the local unit of government. There are advantages and <br />disadvantages to using weight, volume or gross receipts. Use of weight <br />would require landfills that do not have scales to install them. Using <br />volume, can be a problem because much of the waste is compacted further <br />by landfill equipment. However, a charge would be based on the volume of <br />waste received at the landfill gate. <br /> <br />A percentage of gross receipts of a private landfill would compensate the <br />community based on actual operation costs. A percentage of gross <br />receipts from a county-owned landfill may not, but rather reflect cost of <br />the entire waste management system. Another potential problem is that <br />payment for solid waste disposal may be made at a transfer station rather <br />than at a landfill. In that case, the local unit of government would <br />receive nothing. <br /> <br />Most other states use weight or volume to finance their compensation <br />funds for landfills. <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />