Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />'FO: City Administrator <br />FROM: Building Official <br />RE: Monthly Report <br />DATE: July 13~ 1983 <br /> <br />Building continues tQr be somewhat depressed with only three housing <br />starts for the month. However, the Grosslein Warehouse more than <br />made up for the needed valuation. <br /> <br />Mr. Randy Norcross of ~'~1 - 168th Avenue NW has made no effort to <br />relocate bis dri_veway as required the last time I checked. I will, <br />however, continue to'remind him of his Obligations. <br /> <br />Prior to my going on vacation, some tests were made on both the static <br />and residual water pressures at-City Hall and it was determined that <br />there was a problem somewhere. On Tuesday, July 12, 1983, Mr. Terry <br />Johnson of Johnson Plumbing came out and after some disassembly we <br />found a large piece of plaster and some plaster tubing almost entirely <br />blocking th'e 2% inch main feeder line coming from the pressure tank. <br />(Pictures will be available at the meeting.) The degree of difficulty <br />involved in removing these items makes it almost certain that they were <br />in the tank at the time it was installed. However, there would be no <br />way to prove it. This is what has caused our problems with our sprinkler <br />system over the past years. <br /> <br />I've yet to hear from Dickensons in regards to their proposed expansion <br />since my return. It would seem that the urgency of Dickeson's request <br />was not what they indicated. While the added jobs would be nice, what <br />they have proposed does not comply with the requirements of the State <br />Building Code. <br /> <br />I have contacted Anoka County in regards to the ingress/egress for Faith <br />Baptist Church of Ramsey and they h~ve informed me that they will allow <br />only one driveway which will be located on County Road #5 as far to the <br />northwest as feasible. I concur with their requirements as that is what <br />I originally told Reverend Reed I felt would be approved. <br /> <br />Permits Issued/July <br /> <br />Valuation Permit Fee Surcharge <br /> <br />A. Houses 5 <br />B. Comm./Ind. 1 <br />C. Garages 5 <br />D. Additions 3 <br />E. Swimming Pools <br />F. Miscellaneous <br /> <br /> 1 <br />2 <br /> <br />$248,000.00 $ 915.00 $124.O0 <br />400,000.00 737.00 200.00 <br />28,000.00 172.00 14.00 <br />11,000.00 74.00 5.50 <br />6,000.00 36.00 3.00 <br />3,000.00' 30.00 1.50 <br /> <br /> <br />