My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/23/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 02/23/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:47:31 PM
Creation date
3/11/2016 8:29:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/23/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
368
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #16-02-040 <br />RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING <br />PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #16-36 <br />BUSINESS PARK 95 REGIONAL STORMWATER POND IMPROVEMENTS <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted January 12, 2016, a <br />Feasibility Report has been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the proposed <br />Business Park 95 Regional Stormwater Pond Improvements; and <br />WHEREAS, on February 16, 2016, the Ramsey Public Works Committee reviewed the <br />draft Feasibility Report and recommended City Council approval of the Feasibility Report. <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective and feasible as detailed in the revised <br />Feasibility Report accepted by Council on February 23, 2016. <br />2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement, and the <br />engineer is ordered to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such <br />improvements. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />and the following abstained: <br />and the following were absent: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.