Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />ODORS <br /> <br />Odors from a sanitary landfill cannot be completely mitigated and as such are a <br />cost that is borne directly by the residents adjacent to the site. However, <br />this impact, like that of increased truck traffic, is difficult to quantify, <br />That fact makes it difficult to determine who should be compensated and how <br />much they should be paid. One possible method is to compensate any resident <br />within a particular radius of the waste disposal facility. More compensation <br />would be paid to those residents nearest the facility or downwind from it. But <br />there are inherent problems in defining the radius or what is downwind. Some <br />mechanism or procedure is needed to resolve such problems. <br /> <br />LOSS OF TAXES <br /> <br />When land is to be used for a publicly owned sanitary landfill, a community is <br />likely to lose the property taxes to be paid if the land were used for differ- <br />ent purposes. This constitutes an unfair cost to the community. Privately <br />owned facilities pay taxes based upon the rate commercial property is taxed in <br />that community. There could be an increase in tax revenues when a facility is <br />located on a vacant parcel or one previously used for farming. In cases where <br />landfills are publicly owned, it may be appropriate to compensate the local <br />unit of government or special taxing district for tax revenues lost. The facil- <br />ity could be assesed or taxed as if it were a private facility, with revenues <br />raised from a fee or charge on the waste entering the landfill. <br /> <br />Loss of tax revenues may occur once a landfill is sited by decreasing the <br />incentive for residential or commercial development in the community. However, <br />once the landfill is closed, commercial or residential development may be <br />spurred if the landfill is used for a developer's open space or park <br />requirements. <br /> <br />LOSS OF FARMLAND <br /> <br />In some areas, farmland may be lost when a landfill site is selected. Such <br />land cannot be farmed until the fill area is replanted with vegetation, and <br />even then deep-rooted crops could not be planted. The loss of several farms <br />can affect the local economy--local merchants will lose potential customers. <br />What is the magnitude of this economic loss and is compensation appropriate? <br /> <br />INTANGIBLE IMPACTS <br /> <br />COMMUNITY STIGMA <br /> <br />In the perception of its residents and others, a community may become a less <br />desirable place to live because it has a landfill, but it would be difficult to <br />measure the social or psychological burden borne by the members of community. <br />In addition, the impact may affect different people to a different degree. If <br />so, should only those feeling such a stigma be compensated or should the <br />community as a whole? <br /> <br />One possible form of compensation is to give the host community a lump-sum cash <br />payment as a bonus or goodwill offering. However, the amount and appopriate <br />recipients of the cash payment may be difficult to determine. Though some <br />people believe a landfill will impose uncompensable costs, it is standard <br />practice to provide monetary compensation for a wide variety of social costs. <br /> <br /> <br />