My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/1982 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/1982 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:31:58 PM
Creation date
5/19/2004 11:19:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
09/13/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3O <br /> <br />A special tax, or waste-generation tax, requires people to pay for refuse dis- <br />posal in direct proportion to the amount of waste they generate. This tax <br />would establish a base price for one garbage can and an additional sum for each <br />can thereafter. The advantage of this ~ax is that people are charged directly <br />for the amount of waste they generate. ~he problem with this type of tax is <br />that it is difficult to calculate and administer. The problem is compounded by <br />the fact that many odd-sized and shaped refuse items do not fit in-cans. Some <br />items are bundled or placed in plastic bags. Nevertheless, the special tax <br />should be considered because it makes people more aware of the amount of <br />garbage they generate and serves as a basis to reward those people who reduce <br />their waste or recycle. <br /> <br />COMPENSATION <br /> <br />There are various alternatives for financing measures to compensate individuals <br />or host communities for predictable, intangible or uncertain impacts. Either <br />the landfill developer or county could pay compensation to appropriate parties-- <br />the actual mix of public and private funding depending on who owns and operates <br />the facility. For example, when the city repairs the roads used by trucks <br />going to and from a landfill, the county or facility developer could pay for <br />those road repairs needed in addition to regular maintenance. Similarly, if <br />tax revenues are lost to a local community because a public body owns the land, <br />a cash payment could be paid by the county to the local community in lieu of <br />tax revenues. The developer may also provide funds to the community to cover <br />additional expenses for services rendered such as fire protection. <br /> <br />Financing compensation for predictable impacts is similar to financing for <br />mitigating measures. <br /> <br />Intangible and uncertain impacts are best handled by a contingency fund. Under <br />this arrangement, facility developers and operators, the counties.and waste <br />generators would all contribute to such a fund. A contingency fund could be <br />financed in part by the tipping fees described earlier. The size of the fund <br />could be determined by the county or state laws. For example, if the fund <br />reached a designated level after a few years, the tipping fees may be reduced <br />or terminated. Another alternative would be to maintain .the fund indefinitely <br />and use it as collateral to finance waste abatement activities in the local <br />communities. The flexibility built into contingency funds financed by tipping <br />fees is considerable, which makes it an attractive option to consider. The <br />county may compensate host communities by providing additional funds or giving <br />preference to projects that benefit the host community. The county, in <br />cooperation with the PCA and local community, can establish an emergency <br />response plan to handle explosions, spills or other serious incidents. <br /> <br />Sudden-accident liability insurance is a responsibility of the facility owner <br />to cover accidents during operations. Federal law requires the owner or oper- <br />ator of a hazardous waste disposal facility to have liability insurance to <br />cover accidental occurrences. The same kind of arrangement may be appropriate <br />for operators of sanitary landfills. Even with such insurance coverage, how- <br />ever, an aggrieved landowner would still have to prove the liability of a land- <br />fill operator for damages, unless state law imposed strict liability on the <br />operator for sudden accidents. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.