My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/1982 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/1982 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:31:58 PM
Creation date
5/19/2004 11:19:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
09/13/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'1 <br /> <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> The Federal Aviation Administration and' the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have <br /> expressed concern over proximity of the site to the Gateway North Industrial <br /> <br />· Airport because of the potential for creating a bird hazard. There is no <br /> history of conflict with the existing landfill, a point noted in correspondence <br /> between the Fish and Wildlife Service and the MPCA. The Gateway airport is' <br /> approximately 700 feet southwest of the site. It is a private, low-volume <br /> facility. There are no plans for its expansion, although there has been some <br /> consideration that it be closed and moved elsewhere. <br /> <br />The site appears consistent with the imediate surrounding land use, zoning and <br />planned use for the area. The site does not conflict with 'the Council's poli- <br />cies and siting criteria respecting local land use and land use controls. <br /> <br />Council policy requires that sites be visually compatible with adjacent pro- <br />perty; specifically, residential and other nonindustrial uses are compatible <br />only if there are barriers to reduce noise and obscure public view. The site <br />is well screened on the north. Additional screening may be necessary for resi- <br />dential development along the eastern part of the site. Screening is desirable <br />for residential development northwest of the site, although the site should be <br />less intrusive than the existing landfill. ?lanned land uses to the south and <br />west are industrial. <br /> <br />Existin~ and Future Development Patterns <br /> <br />Urban services are planned to be introduced in areas south and east of the site <br />over the coming decade. There is also a possibility that services will be pro- <br />vided west of the site by the year 2000. The industrial land directly south of <br />the site has locally been planned to receive sewer service in 1984. Ramsey is <br />also in the preliminary phases of planning to provide municipal water service. <br />Lands north of the site are not planned for sewer or water service in the near <br />future, but will continue as low-density residential development areas. <br /> <br />It appears that the site would not adversely impact the area's existing and <br />future development patterns. <br /> <br />Environmental Impacts <br /> <br />The proposed site is located within the Anoka sand plain, a series of glacial <br />outwash plains. Well logs from the area show a 35- to 60-foot surface mantle <br />of sand and gravel, underlain by gray silty till, with discontinuous layers of <br />clay and gravel. The till depth ranges from approximately 100 to 150 feet. <br /> <br />The first bedrock formation is the St. Lawrence, which functions as a confining <br />layer and is not an aquifer. Underlying the St. Lawrence are Franconia, <br />Ironton and Galesville formations, which are aquifers used for water supply <br />purposes. Figure 3 shows a geological section for the area and Figure 4 <br />illustrates depth to underlying bedrock. <br /> <br />The majority of wells in the surrounding area are finished in the upper Fran- <br />'conia formation which is artesian. The remaining wells are finished in the <br />glacial till. No water supply wells have been identified in the overlying-sand <br />mantle. The report Evaluation of Water Resources~ Mmnitoring~ Sanitary Land- <br />fills 9f Anoka Coun_Q_t~_* notes that it is doubtful that the surficial aquifer <br />is used as a source of potable water. Local well codes prohibit construction <br />of new wells in this aquifer and in the upper drift aquifer. <br /> <br />*Barr Engine.ering~ 1981. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.