Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> these areas are an integral element .of Ramsey's storm drainage plan (see Figure <br />I7). The county should work with the city to ensure that as site design <br />progresses, a drainageway is maintained, but diverted to the buffer along the <br />western part of the site. There is one small unprotected wetland on-site, <br />which is planned to be filled. <br /> <br />Council siting criteria specify that slopes should be between two and 12 per- <br />cent in order to provide adequate but not excessive drainage. MPCA's review <br />noted that the site is flat to gently rolling and should require no special <br />drainage control measures. <br /> <br />Protection of Aqriculture and Natural Resources <br /> <br />Soils on the site do not exhibit high agricultural potential, and the proposed <br />use would not conflict with Council policies for agricultural protection. <br /> <br />As noted above, site d6sign should be modified to protect an on-site marshy <br />area connecting with an off-site wetland. Public comment noted that the site <br />currently provides good wildlife habitat, which would be lost by landfill <br />development. However, change in the character of the area would also be likely <br />with the industrial development anticipated in the city's land use plan. <br /> <br />Transportation and Other Services and Facilities Appropriate to Land Disposal <br /> <br />Access to the site is good. Primary access is provided by Hwy. 10 and by ~ .~-~ ....... ~. <br />County Rd. 57. No road upgrading would be required. ~ .... ~ <br /> <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />Fire protection service is available nearby. Service would be provided by the <br />Anoka fire department. Response time would be five to 10 minutes. The site <br />within 10 miles of Mercy Hospital for emergency medical care. However, the <br />only d~rect access route to the site crosses the Burlington Northern tracks, <br />possibly delaying emergency response measures. <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Patterns of Solid Waste Generation <br /> <br />The proposed site is in close proximity to major areas of waste generation in <br />Anoka County: the cities of Anoka and Coon Rapids, and suburban development in <br />Ramsey and Andover. Access via Hwy. 10 is excellent for Blaine, Fridley and <br />Columbia Heights. All but the three easternmost townships in Anoka County are <br />within a 15-mile hauling distance of the site. <br /> <br />The county has proposed that the site have an available disposal capacity of <br />2,850 acre-feet (4.5 million cubic yards). Without taking i~to account recy- <br />cling and recovery opportunities, it is estimated that Anoka County alone will <br />have a landfill capacity demand over the next 20 years in excess of 5,200 acre- <br />feet. Thus, the site's proposed capacity is consistent with locally needed <br />capacity. <br /> <br />Facilits's Proposed Final Use <br /> <br />The county has indicated that the site would be suitable for parkland or pos- <br />sible, reclamation for industrial development. Both uses are consistent with <br />local plans. However, a more detailed end-use plan should be developed as <br />further studies on the site are undertaken. <br /> <br />Quality of Other Potential Sites <br /> <br />Anoka County's landfill siting effort began with identification of site selec- <br />tion criteria. Relevant provisions of federal and state regulations and the <br /> <br /> <br />