Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />The need for the additional public services would depend on the size and loca- <br />tion of the landfill. Most of the additional services would be required during <br />· operation of the landfill. The only services required after closure of the <br />landfill would be periodic routine .site inspections to determine whether or not <br />the cover has eroded or cracked, vegetation has taken hold, surface water is <br />being adequately drained and leachate has escaped. <br /> <br />However, the burden created when closed sanitary landfill sites become the <br />responsibility of the host community may be considerable. Although the site <br />may be replanted with vegetation, the host community will have to deal with the <br />potential for long-term impacts, particularly groundwater contamination or <br />methane explosions. <br /> <br />One of the most demanding public service burdens for a community would be for <br />increased road repair. The extent of repairs required would depend on how much <br />additional traffic would travel on routes going to facility sites. Another <br />potential and very costly service the community may need to provide is exten- <br />sion of water supply mains. A public water supply may have to be extended to <br />homeowners whose private wells are contaminated. <br /> <br />The increased burden on local governments to provide certain municipal services <br />can be substantially reduced by requiring the operator of the waste facility to <br />either pay directly for the service or provide the service itself. Require- <br />ments can be placed on the facility operators to provide their own litter <br />maintenance programs. Specific user fees can be assessed against the facility <br />by the host community to pay for other needed public services {such as water, <br />sewers or traffic controls~. The increased wear and tear on roads can be <br />partially offset by upgrading roads, enforcing weight limits and increasing <br />maintenance. <br /> <br />The local community need not be solely responsible for inspection and adverse <br />impacts of a site once it has closed. Fiscal and legal responsibility can be <br />shared by the owner/operator, the state, the Metropolitan Council and the <br />county. <br /> <br />Before a site receives an operating permit, the financial soundness of the <br />owner should be investigated. Liability insurance or some other long-term care <br />provisions can be required of the site's owner/operator. Where needed, legis- <br />lation providing for strict liability can be enacted. With federal law placing <br />a 30-year limit on postclosure care for hazardous wste disposal facilities, the <br />state can assume liability after the 30-year period. Postclosure requirements <br />and the future use of the site can be designated in the permit and be a part of <br />the local community's comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />The measures that could be taken to reduce the local unit of government's <br />burden are really compensatory. They are discussed later in this report. <br /> <br />USE OF PUBLIC LANDS <br /> <br />Public lands may be selected as locations for landfills. In such cases, a land- <br />fill may conflict with concurrent land uses. The term "public lands" refers to <br />any publicly owned area, such as a regional park, regional park reserve, Uni- <br />versity of Minnesota property, or other state, county or municipally owned <br />property. Public lands are used for many purposes. Regional parks may provide <br />recreational facilities for swimming, picnicking, boating, fishing, camping and <br /> <br /> <br />