My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/28/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 09/28/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:32:08 PM
Creation date
5/19/2004 11:27:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/28/1982
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />September 13, 1982 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />The removal of a significant amount of fill from the slope in <br />conjunction with the design method is not justified to gain riparian <br />access. While the right to riparian access is fully recognized, the <br />design method did not minimize alteration of the natural amenities of <br />the Rum River. The resultant access is highly visible and contrasts <br />sharply with the surrounding landscape, by imparting a 'notch' in aH <br />otherwise level slope. It is our opinion, that reasonable access <br />could have been achieved by installing the steps at angles to the <br />slope instead of perpendicular to it, and that a narrower step width <br />could have been utilized. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />Proper erosion control methods were also lacking at the site, since <br />it was obvious that soil had washed into the river due to recent <br />rains. <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />Preliminary inspection of the City of Ramsey's Flood <br />Boundary-Floodway Map, Panel 2706810010B (enclosed) reveals that the <br />parcel may be inside of the City's designated floodway for the Rum <br />River. Since material was removed from the top of the slope and <br />possibly spread within the floodway, a conditional use permit <br />pursuant to the City's Flood Plain Ordinance would be required to <br />determine if the activity would cause stage increases to the lO0-year <br />flood. To our knowledge no such permit has been applied for. <br /> <br />III. In order to properly resolve the points as outlined above, it is our <br /> recommendation that the City con-sider the following items: <br /> <br />l) <br /> <br />Methods to control erosion at the site be in.stalled immediately. <br />This could be accomplished by sodding, bdt dependent on the <br />subsequent reivew and approval of plans to be submitted by the <br />landowner, straw mulch could be spread over the soil and hay bales <br />placed at the perimeter of the site, as a temporary measure. This <br />would allow for future restoration and refilling of excavated slope <br />areas if the City wishes to pursue that option. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />Mr. Potter should be required to furnish the City with a site <br />development landscaping plan that would fully address the conclusion <br />of Section II of this letter. The plan should offer methods that can <br />effectively screen the house and the top portion of the slope, when <br />viewed from the river in summer months. The installation of trees, <br />shrubbery and a better blending in of the steps on the slope are <br />major items of consideration. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />A conditional use permit under the City's flood plain ordinance <br />should be applied for if it is determined that fill was graded into <br />the floodway. (Staff from the Metro Region, Division of Waters can <br />assist the City in administration of the flood plain requirements). <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.