Laserfiche WebLink
,I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />CASE #2: <br /> <br />a~ <br /> <br />Findings of Fact - Council will have to review and adopt <br />the Findings of Fact and in this process you may want to <br />amend the Findings of Fact as presented by the Planning <br />and Zoning Commission. The following proposed motion is <br />hereby submitted for your consideration: J~l <br /> <br /> Motion by' <br /> and seconded by ... to <br /> adopt the Findings of Fact as presented/to adopt the <br /> Findings of Fact with amendments in regards to the <br /> request from Mr. A1 Bullick to rezone Lot 4, Block 3, <br /> Riverside West in the City of Rams~ <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes <br /> Voting no <br /> <br />b) Act on Rezoning regarding Mr. A1 Bullick's Request to Rezone <br /> <br />Lot 4, Block 3, Riverside West - Council action now will <br />be to act on the rezoning request. The following proposed <br />motion is hereby submitted for your consideratip~: ..... <br /> Motion by ~//~ and seconded by ,~~to <br /> ~/di~ °f Mr. A1 Bullick s request to rezone <br /> Lot 4, Block 3, Riverside West from R-1 to B-1. The <br /> following reason(s) are hereb~ stated for thi~.action: <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes ~~-- . <br /> Voting no <br /> <br />MINNESOTA UTILITIES' REQUEST FOR ANOTHER BUILDING: <br /> <br />Mr. Lloyd Bearle of Minnesota Utilities will be present to represent <br />their request to construct another 40 x 60 building south of the building <br />that they are presently adding to. They have indicated construction <br />will be the same as the other buildings (see Building Official's report <br />for his comments). <br /> <br />Council Action: Council action in this matter will be to approve/ <br />disapprove of the request. If your action is to approve, then it <br />should be contingent upon approval by the Building Official of the <br />applicant's plans. The following proposed motion is hereby submitted <br />for your consideration: <br /> <br />Motion by and seconded by to approve/dis- <br />approve of Minnesota Utilities' request for an additional 40 x 60 <br />metal building as per their site and design plan. Further, that <br />they enter into an agreement with the City in regards to the site <br />and design plan. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes <br />Voting no <br /> <br /> <br />