Agenda - Council - 12/21/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I i I I exterior finish, type of construction ~N)and proposed footings do not comply with the requirements of our Ordinance. 2) As noted previously, the developer has indicated that the owner does not want to install the hard.surfaced floor as required by the State Building Code. It should be noted that a drain system, with a flammable waste separator is also required where more than five vehicles are to be parked. I would not recommend variances to either of these requirements. 3) The developer's plans do not show any fire department access area~ and therefore a sprinkler system would be required. Variances to this require- ment have been granted in the past, contingent upon the owner agreeing to provide a sprinkler system within 30 days of the availability of City water. City Council will have to determine if a variance, in this case~ should be granted. 4) There is no screening or landscaping proposed. The City Council must determine if this is a necessity. 5) The site access will be to Sunfish Lake Blvd. The traveled roadway on the south side of this property is only a 33 ft. easement and not a City street. 6) The site drainage has not been considered at all. I have looked at the site briefly and it appeared to me to be in a low area. Without actually shooting elevations it is almost impossible to ascertain where the drainage goes. I think it is incumbant upon the City to require this item be addressed because if drainage problems do develop in the future, the City will most certainly be asked to assist in solving the problem. The final item that I have asked both the developer (Morton Builders) and Hunts to consider is that sewer and water will probably soon be in the area~ This, in my opinion, would inflate land values to a point where a more intense use than storage will have to be considered for the property. CRB :~jc