Agenda - Council - 12/21/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I 15) 16) ~8) ~9) 2o) 2~) 22) That Mr. Peltzer again at a later point in the meeting, addressed the City Council and they agreed to allow Mr. Peltzer an extension of time until 5:00 P.M., Monday, November 29, 1982, to deposit with the City his $300 escrow and apply for a variance at a cost of $50.00. That the $50.00 fee as requested was later improper as a variance which deals with structure must be granted by the Board of Adjustment and further that said fee for a Board of Adjustment variance has been es- tablished at $90.00. That on November 29, 1982, Mr. Pel'tzer deposited with the City a cashiers check in t~e amount of $300. That on December 1, 1982, Mr. Pettzer applied for a Board of Adjustment variance to keep the mobile home on his property until June 1, 1982 and paid the proper fee. That the Board of Adjustment variance is required because it deals with .structure. That Mr. Peltzers mobile home does not comply with the requirements of tt~e mobile home ordinance. That a mobile home was placed and is still in use at Greenberg's on Highway #10. That sa~d mobile home was authorized by a conditional use permit to aid in security of the automobile lot. 23) That the variance criteria are as follows: a) That there are exceptional, unique, or extraordinary circum- stances or conditions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district inasmuch as Mr. Peltzer has necessary farm buildings and farm animals at this residence. b) That such a variance is necessary for the preservation and en- joyment of a substantial propertY right similar to that possessed by other properties in the City. ' ' c) That the authorizing of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the intent and purpose of this ordinance or the public interest; d) That the condition or situation of the specific piece of prop- erty, or the intended use of said property, for which the variance is sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situation; ~) That the variance observes the spirit and intent of this ordi- nance, produces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.