Laserfiche WebLink
! <br />! <br /> <br />Mr. Commers inquired if Mr. Ihrke knew of any studies that prove property <br />value is decreased because of being located adjacent to a T.V. tower. <br /> <br />Mr. Fults replied that he recently sold a lot in Coon Rapids, adjacent to <br />WCCO tower, that went for more than a comparable lot that was not located <br />adjacent to a T.V. to~er. <br /> <br />Terry Bruneau - If the residents of Rolling Green choose to take legal action, <br />because the City rezoned to allow this proposed use and thereby decreased our <br />property value, who is responsible? <br /> <br />Mr. ?eterson replied that the City would not be rezoning but..§ranting=~ <br />conditional use permit, that the residents could file suit against Group <br />W and present a case of property value loss in court, that the City would <br />not be responsible unless the residents named Ramsey in their court case. <br /> <br />Terry Bruneau - Stated that he is extremely opposed to the cable T.V. tower <br />being located in a residential area. <br /> <br />! <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />Stuart Smith - 6720 166th Lane N.W. - The proposed location for the tower is <br />in direct line with my living room picture window. If any member of the <br />Commission were in the market'for a home and one prospect had a T.V. tower <br />adjacent and one prospect did not, which home would you purchase? <br /> <br />Leo Kinebel - Why couldn't the tower be located at the landfill? <br /> <br />Mr. Fults replied that the landfill area was researched as a probable site, <br />but there would be interference from the airport and KANO. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Leo Kinebel stated that, for the record, he is opposed to the T.V. tower <br />in a residential area. <br /> <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />Con~issioner Deemer stated that unless the T.V. tower can be located south <br />of 149th, it will end up in a residential area. He further stated that <br />there are a lot of electronic factors that enter into determining the best <br />location for a T.V. tower. Mr. Deemer guarantees that Group W has investigated <br />several sites before selecting Outlot A of Rolling Green. Mr. Deemer stated <br />that he also serves as an alternate on the Cable T.V.-Committee, that he <br />has been closely watching Group W's progress and that he is sure Outlot A <br />is the most desireable site. <br /> <br />Gary Meyer - Group W - Stated that Group W has researched six sites in <br />Ramsey, that the site must be centrally located with no anticipated <br />interference. <br /> <br />Tom Ihrke - Stated that he is not opposed to cable T.V. but that he is <br />opposed to the proposed location for the tower. <br /> <br />Bob Anderson - 16611 Dolomite - Stated that he is opposed to the T,V. tower <br />being'located at this proposed site. <br /> <br />Mr. Bruneau - Inquired if the six properties researched were all residential? <br /> <br />Mr. Commers replied that all centrally located, available properties in <br />Ramsey are residential. <br /> <br />P & Z/December 7, 1982 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />