Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Waldowski, 14743 Bowers Drive NW, is requesting to merge his two lots <br />together. This was before the City Council on May 25, 1982 at which time <br />the Council tabled the request until the June 22, 1982 meeting. Please <br />refer to enclosure D-3, Case #4 (Council New Business) of Council agenda <br />dated May 25, 1982. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Accordingly, the Staff does not see a problem in Mr. Waldowski's combining <br />of his two lots, providing he understands that he will be assessed for two <br />units. ~]e City's policy has been to allow individuals to combine lots, <br />with the understanding that they will be assessed for two units. In those <br />cases where the Council would allow the combining of two lots b6t only assess <br />out for one unit, Council has required that the individual understand that <br />he would not be able to ever resubdivide this particular parcel of land and <br />this was done by resolution and a signed agreement between the City and the <br />individual. <br /> <br />Council has to be very careful that they are consistent in these cases and <br />that they document their action. <br /> <br />Council Action: Your action will be as follows: <br /> <br />a) Deny Mr. Waldowski's request to combine his two lots. <br /> <br />b) To allow Mr. Waldowski to combine his two lots but assess him for <br /> two un. its. He would still save on his property tax, as this would <br /> reduce his property valuat~ion by approximately $7,000.00. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />To allow Mr. Waldowski to combine his two lots and assess him for <br />one unit. This would mean he would receive only a one iunit assess~ <br />meat for the Bowers Drive street improvement instead of the two <br />units. <br /> <br />Any of the above will require action by resolution. However, if you go with <br />the action contained in subparagraph (c), we would have to have the City <br />Attorney draft up the agreement and Mr. Waldowski should pay for those costs. <br />The following proposed motion is hereby submitted for your consideration: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CASE #6: <br /> <br />Motion by <br />#82- to <br /> <br />and seconded by <br /> <br />to adopt Resolution <br /> <br />' (Please refer to resolution file for Resolution #82- .) <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes <br /> Voting no <br /> <br />APPOINTING OF MEMBERS TO SERVE ON AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING <br /> <br /> PRO~?SED POLICY FOR COUNCIL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PU~. LIC UTIL. ITIES (SANITARY <br /> ~/;~ AND WATER), STORM SEWER AND STREETS: <br /> ~Co~cil, at their regular meeting of May 25, 1982 approved of an ad hoc committee <br /> the purpose of developing proposed policy for implementation of public <br />/J~/~~ (sanitary sewer and water), storm sewer and streets in the City, <br /> Co .~.'~'tabled the appointments of members to this corm~ittee until this Council <br /> m~t~g. Accordingly, the EDC did submit the Commissioner's to be appointed <br /> <br /> <br />