Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />For Release: <br /> <br />4:00 p.m., 5/27/82 <br /> <br />Business Item: B-6 <br /> <br /> METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 <br /> <br />REPORT OF THE PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT COMMI1-FEE <br /> Referral Report No. 81-243 <br /> <br />TO: Metropolitan Council <br /> <br />SUB JE CT: <br /> <br />City of Ramsey Comprehensive Plan Review <br />Metropolitan Council District No. 12 <br />Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 9040-2 <br /> <br />On May 27, 1982, the Physical Development Committee considered the attached <br />report on the comprehensive plan of the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />The recor~endations were adopted as follows: <br /> <br /> That Ramsey be advised that: <br /> <br />A. This report constitutes the Council's official review required under <br /> the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. <br /> <br />.B. No plan modifications are required. <br /> <br />C. The Ramsey plan relates to metropolitan system plans as follows: <br /> <br />The plan is in conformance with the Transportation Policy Plan, <br />the Regional Recreation Open Space System, and the metropolitan <br />system plan for airports. <br /> <br />The plan is in conformity With the Metropolitan Council's system <br />plan for sewers in that it meets the planning requirements for <br />sanitary sewers and on-site system management. <br /> <br />Dg <br /> <br />Following the adoption of the plan by the city, Ramsey should <br />submit the comprehensive sewer plan portion to the MWCC for its <br />review. That plan should address the additional comments raised <br />by the MWCC. <br /> <br />The plan'appears generally compJtible with the plans of adjacent and <br />affected units. Con~nents of a lo~al nature have been raised by the <br />City of Anoka. These concerns should be worked out between the <br />cities. <br /> <br />E. The plan relates to other Metropolitan Development Guide chapters as <br /> follows: <br /> <br /> <br />