Agenda - Council - 04/27/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 7) PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT RICHARD HARTMAN 8) 9) 10) 11) 12 ) 13) That the Applicant has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance, as required by City Ordinance, to construct a detached accessory building larger than allowed by City Ordinance. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing on April 27, 1982. That said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public ~earing are hereby incorporated by reference. That the Applicant has, on his application, stated that the use of the proposed structure will be for the storage of personal property. That said application is hereby incoporated by reference. That the Applicant's property is approximately one acre in size ~and that it is Plat 89224, Parcel 5790. That the Applicant's request is to build an accessory building 36 feet by 54 feet for a total of 1,944 square feet. That City Ordinance would, on a parcel of property this size, allow an attached garage of 864 square feet and a detached garage of 624 square feet for a combined total of 1,488 square feet. That the City Council, in the past, has denied requests for accessory buildings that did not comply with the Ordinance in regards to size. That there are not exceptional, unique, or extraordinary circumstances or condi- tions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. That such variance is necessary not for the preservation and enjoyment of a sub- stantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity. The possibility of increased financial return shall not in itself be deemed sufficient to warrant a variance. That the authorizing of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the intent and purpose of this Ordinance or the public interest. That the condition or situation of the specific piece of property, or the intended use of said property, for which the variance is sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situation. That the variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces sub- stantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. That properly constructed, the building would comply with the. requirements of the State Building Code. ~~_~ ~ ~~j~, ~~~ [/