My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/29/1982 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 03/29/1982 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:29:11 PM
Creation date
5/20/2004 11:12:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
03/29/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~' ASPHALT COMPANY <br /> 700 Industry Avenue N.W., Anoka, Minn. 55303 <br /> <br /> Phone (612) 42714900 <br /> <br />BITUMINOUS <br />CONTRACTORS <br /> <br />· Ready Mixed Black Top <br /> <br />· Sand <br />· Gravel <br />· Fill <br /> <br />March 29, 1982 <br /> <br />Anoka County Highway Department <br />325 E. Ma~n St. <br />Anoka, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Re: Rum River Crossing <br /> <br />Dear Sirs: <br /> <br />We would like to inform you of our full support for the Rum River <br />Crossing using the 3 or 3A proposal, <br /> <br />We feel that the construction of this bridge would greatly influence <br />the future growth of all the communities north of the Burlinton rail- <br />road tracks. Also, as stated at the public hearing March 18, 1982, we <br />feel it is very important for fire protection, ambulance service and <br />for better access and safety for the transportation of our childern to <br />and from school. <br /> <br />We oppose the changes proposed-by the Rum River Homeowners Association <br />because we feel it would interrupt the flow of traffic and add an <br />additional dangerous intersection. We feel that more property would <br />have to be appropriated due to the fact that their proposal would mean <br />having to establish new right of ways, whereas on County Road ll6 the <br />right of way has already been established. <br /> <br />Thank you. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />H & S ASPHALT COMPANY <br /> <br />W.G. Miller <br />Treasurer <br /> <br />WGM:vo <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.