Agenda - Council - 03/23/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

- 12 - '1 I I I I This information was used as a first level or coarse screening. Large areas of the county shown as generally exhibiting less limitation were then singled out for more detailed evaluation. Primary and secondary search areas were identi- fied encompassing virtually all of the central part of the county. tThe siting criteria were again applied to the search areas based on more detailed information. Existing and platted residential development was eli- ~iminated, as were poorly drained soils, highly productive agricultural soils, parks and areas in or near water bodies. This phase of the siting effort resulted in identification of 15 possible search areas. In addition, the Ram- sey site was added following a demonstration that it satisfied adopted county criteria for expansion of existing landfills. Based on input from the public at an informational meeting held in April 1981, two additional sites were identified. I I I Each site was characterized with respect to residential development, soils, parks, surface water, agriculture and other pertinent factors. Reduction in the number of sites to the complement specified by the WMA was accomplished by Anoka County Board action, based on the recommendations and deliberations of the county's Health Board and Environmental Services Committee. The Ramsey site compares favorably with other potential sites identified in the county's siting process. CONCLUSIONS I I I The proposed Ramsey site is compatible with planned industrial land uses to the south and east. For nearby residential areas, the site should be less intrusive than the existing landfill. The site is closer to the Gateway North Industrial Airport than recommended by Federal Aviation Administration guidelines. The site is not expected to adversely affect existing or future development in the immediate area. I I I I I Soils on the site are highly permeable and do not protect surficial ground- water. Lower aquifers are artesian and appear also to be protected by a confining bedrock formation. The system of double liners and collection systems, as proposed by the county, should adequately protect the surficial and upper drift aquifers. A marshy area at the southwest corner of the site should be buffered and protected from surface water contamination. Use of the site is not in conflict with Council policies for agricultural preservation and protection of natural resources. 6. Access to the site is excellent. No roadway upgrading is needed. 7. The site is within a feasible hauling distance from potential waste generation sources. 8. The site was satisfactorily evaluated in light of the Quality of other potential sites. SA268C 3/12/82