Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />;I <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />F ROM: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Enclosure (D2-a) Memo from City Staff dated March 1, 1982 regarding Comprehensive <br /> Plan alternatives <br /> <br />CASE #1: <br /> <br />CASE 92: <br /> <br />RAMSEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: <br /> <br />Enclosure (D2-a) contains the following documents: <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />Memo from City Staff dated March 1, 1982 to City Council <br />regarding Comprehensive Plan alternatives. It should be <br />noted that alternative #3 has been deleted as an alterna- <br />tive. <br /> <br />b) Resolution #82- requesting second sanitary sewer con, <br /> nection. This will be available at the meeting. <br /> <br />c) Resolution #82- regarding location of second sanitary <br /> sewer connection. This will be available at the meeting. <br /> <br />Council Action: Your action will be to review the alternatives con- <br />tained in the Staff memo which gives you two alternatives in regards <br />to adopting the Comprehensive Plan. If you do not agree to any of <br />those alternatives, then I think the Council should themselves enter <br />into direct negotiations with the Metro Council or allow the plan to <br />proceed as is and make your statement at the Physical Development <br />Commission's review of our plan or wait until the total Council has <br />taken action on it and then make a decision. That could be a rather <br />dangerous route to take on this issue. <br /> <br />Secondly, we will have the resolutions listed in subparagraphs b and <br />c above for your review and adoption at the meeting. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION REGARDING DELETING FROM ORDINANCE $82-5, PARCEL "D" REZONING <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />FROM B-~ T~ RBi-~, THAT TOTAL PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE <br />OF 167TH AVENUE AT THE INTERSECTION OF STATE HIG~AY #47: <br /> <br />It has been requested by Councilmember Sue Van Wagner that the follow- <br />ing parcel that was rezoned from B-1 to RB-la be put back on the agenda <br />for further discussion: <br /> <br /> <br />