My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/26/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 01/26/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:27:52 PM
Creation date
5/21/2004 11:58:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/26/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />County of Anoka <br />Comprehensive Plan Review <br />Page Two <br /> <br />b j <br /> <br />Following the adoption of the Plan, Anoka County should <br />submit the "comprehensive sewer policy plan" portion of the <br />Plan to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for its <br />review. <br /> <br />3. Parks <br /> <br />as <br /> <br />The Anoka County Comprehensive Plan conforms with the <br />Regional Recreation ~pen Space 'System as' defined by the 1977 <br />system statement. <br /> <br />The Plan should be amended under the provisions of Minnesota <br />Statute 473.856 to include the potential regional trail <br />corridors in the County. <br /> <br />4. Airports <br /> <br /> Anoka County should monitor and coordinate with the affected <br /> governmental units concerning future roadway actions in the Anoka- <br /> Blaine Airport area. <br /> <br />The Plan appears basically compatible with the plans of adjacent <br />governmental units and the affected school districts. The County <br />should continue to cooperate with the cities, townships and other <br />units of government in addressing comments raised during the Plan <br />review. <br /> <br />The Plan relates to other adopted Metropolitan Development Framework <br />Guide chapters as follows: <br /> <br />The Plan is consistent with the Metropolitan Development <br />Framework Guide chapter with one exception. The County should <br />delete Policy 11 on page LU-21 or modify it so as to not <br />'encourage the use 'of intermediate or long-term agricultural <br />preservation devices in the County's General Urban Area. <br /> <br />2. Metropolitan Investment Framework <br /> <br />The County should follow the definition in MSA 473.852, <br />Subdivision 4, when preparing'its capital improvement <br />program(s). Each program should show projects planned for a <br />five-year prospective period, a statement concerning the need <br />for each project, the financial sources, and the financial <br />impact that each improvement will have on the County. to <br />improve its Plan, the County should include a schedule of <br />annual principal and interest payments on its outstanding <br />indebtedness, until such time as the debt is retired. <br /> <br />Ds <br /> <br />At such time as the County amends its capital improvement <br />program (at least biennially),~ it should send a copy to the <br />Metropolitan Council for review and comment. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.