Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />December 23, 1981 <br />--2-- <br /> <br />somewhat discretionary as I read it. Apparently the City has made no <br />examination under paragraph 1. To say that if no areas are required for <br />storm water holding, etc., then the City "may" require area to be dedicated <br />to the p~blic or an increase in the land area, and that is definitely <br />8iscretio~ary. The involved contribution required of a subdivider is set <br />forth in paragraph 2, and this, of course, is also discretionary because it <br />depends upon what is done under paragraph 1. <br /> <br />May I have the courtesy of a reply from the City Attorney, and a ruling on <br />this effect, and also an indication from you as to when the ma~ter may be <br />heard or can be set down by the City Council in case there is some diffi- <br />culty concerning this. <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br /> <br />ROYAL ESQUIRE REALTY, INC. <br />By~ <br /> <br />Alfred A. Albert <br />Agent for James G. Marx <br /> <br /> <br />